Wage and Hour Case Studies - Today's DOL Violation Trends
September 28, 2022
Wage and Hour Case Studies - Today's DOL Violation Trends

The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (WHD) is tasked with enforcing employment laws that affect more than 148 million workers. The WHD enforces federal minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping and child labor requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as well as the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and a number of other employment standards and worker protections. According to the DOL, the core enforcement obligations of the WHD’s investigators include conducting investigations to determine if employers are paying workers and affording them their rights as required by law; helping ensure that law-abiding employers are not undercut by employers who violate the law; promoting compliance through outreach and public education initiatives; and supporting efforts to combat worker retaliation and worker misclassification as independent contractors. In fiscal year 2021, the WHD collected $230 million in wages owed to 190,000 workers, the DOL reported.


Generally, the WHD will initiate an investigation after a current or former employee files a complaint. A WHD investigator may visit an employer to provide information about the application of and compliance with the laws administered

by the WHD. An investigator may also visit an organization to conduct interviews, examine time clocks and ensure all employment notifications are available to employees. Additionally, they may review up to three years of wage and hour records to determine whether there are any violations in an employer’s payroll practices.


In addition to complaints, the WHD selects certain businesses and industries for investigation. For example, the WHD often targets low-wage industries due to high rates of violations, the employment of vulnerable workers or rapid industry changes, such as growth or decline. Occasionally, several organizations in a specific geographic area will be examined.


At the start of 2022, the DOL announced an initiative to hire 100 additional WHD investigators, signaling a potential increase in enforcement in 2022 and beyond. This initiative means now is the time for employers to review their wage and hour practices to ensure compliance with all relevant laws.


This article contains case studies that explore the most recent, real-world examples of employers found to be in violation of wage and hour laws. The case studies include snapshots of violations and general guidance on how employers can prevent similar issues. Employers can examine these case studies to learn from the mistakes of others in comparable industries and avoid costly consequences.


Real-world Case Studies


TAMPA, FL—A DOL investigation uncovered child labor violations by a fast-food restaurant franchisee. The franchisee had to pay more than $12,000 in civil monetary penalties.


What went wrong:

  • The organization allowed 17 employees who were minors—between ages 14 and 15—to work past 7 p.m.
  • The organization also allowed minor employees to work more than three hours during a school day when doing so was not permitted.


----------------       

ROCHESTER, NY—A DOL investigation found that a health care agency failed to pay its home health care aids overtime wages. The organization was forced to pay more than $228,000 in back wages for the 260 affected workers.


What went wrong:

  • Although the organization paid its health care aids overtime for hours worked over 44, it failed to pay workers time-and-a-half wages for hours between 40 and 44 they worked per week.


----------------       


NEW ORLEANS—A DOL investigation discovered that two contractors misclassified their painters and drywall workers as independent contractors. The organizations were forced to pay more than $246,000 in back wages for 306 workers.


What went wrong:

  • One organization misclassified its workers as independent contractors.
  • The same organization also failed to pay workers time-and-a-half overtime wages after they exceeded 40 hours in a workweek and instead used their regular rate of pay.
  • Both organizations failed to maintain complete and accurate records of the hours their employees worked.
  • The DOL determined that a joint employment relationship existed between the two organizations and, as a result, they were both liable to pay back wages.


 ----------------           

ATLANTA—A DOL investigation found that the Georgia Department of Public Health wrongly disciplined and terminated an employee for absences protected under the FMLA. The department was ordered to pay more than $77,000 in back wages and reinstate the employee.


What went wrong:

  • The department denied the employee’s request for leave for an FMLA-qualified condition.
  • The employee’s denial of FMLA benefits resulted in wrongful discipline and subsequent termination.


  ----------------   


Avoiding Violations

As illustrated by the case studies, avoiding wage and hour violations isn’t always easy. Due to the complex nature of employment laws, compliance is an ongoing challenge for employers. Reviewing these laws and regulations infrequently or only a handful of times is rarely sufficient, but by reviewing these laws regularly, employers can keep their businesses compliant and their workers satisfied. Below is general guidance related to the issues discussed earlier, categorized by violation type.


Child Labor Violations

Hiring minors comes with greater employer responsibilities, as minors have a number of specific wage and hour protections. Failing to comply with laws protecting this worker segment can be particularly costly.


The DOL recently publicized investigations uncovering child labor law violations. The WHD’s recent investigations of three grocery store operators in Idaho and Oregon resulted in more than $240,000 in civil penalties and $114,382 in unpaid overtime and liquidated damages for 266 employees. From 2017 to 2021, the DOL identified more than 4,000 cases of child labor law violations, finding more than 13,000 youth-aged workers employed in a violation.


In the Tampa, Florida, case study detailed in this article, minors were allowed to work later and more often than permitted by law. All of these instances are violations of the child labor provisions of the FLSA. Perhaps this was due to a shortage of workers, and only minors were available for specific positions and hours. Despite challenges in the current labor market, employers must remain compliant with all relevant state and federal laws governing child labor.


Employers should also consider regularly consulting with attorneys to ensure policies and practices are up to date and compliant.


Overtime Violations

The FLSA requires employers to pay covered nonexempt employees overtime wages—at a rate of time-and-a-half—if they exceed 40 hours in a workweek. Some companies utilize a variety of tactics to avoid paying these wages, including those that are unlawful.


In this article’s Rochester, New York, case study, the health care agency maintained and followed a practice in which home health care aids were paid straight time until they had worked more than 44 hours in a week. However, these employees were eligible for overtime pay once they had worked more than 40 hours. This case study demonstrates the importance of properly constructed and regularly reviewed workplace policies and manager training. Consulting with experts and having them review policies prior to their enforcement could save employers tens of thousands of dollars down the line. According to the DOL, employers may also contact the WHD to ensure they understand their responsibilities and avoid similar violations.


Employee Misclassification

One of the most serious problems facing employers is the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. Under the FLSA, employees are entitled to basic workplace protections that do not extend to independent contractors, such as minimum wage, overtime pay, protected FMLA leave, antidiscrimination and antiretaliation protections, workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance. The WHD is responsible for determining whether an employee has been misclassified as an independent contractor. Employers who misclassify workers may be forced to pay back wages, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees and costs.


In the New Orleans, Louisiana, case study examined in this article, one contractor misclassified its workers as independent contractors. The workers were paid straight-time rates for all hours they worked. Because these workers were employees, they should have been paid time-and-a-half wages after they surpassed 40 hours in a workweek. Both contractors were also required to keep complete and accurate records of all hours their employees worked. This case reveals the importance of correctly classifying workers at the outset of the relationship and ensuring accurate and complete records are kept.


Sometimes it can be difficult to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. However, seeking legal advice in these situations can help curtail potential violations and costly mistakes.


FMLA Violations

The FMLA protects workers who need to take a prolonged absence due to a qualified family or medical reason. This law was enacted so employees could deal with serious and potentially unexpected life circumstances without losing their jobs. Yet, an employee can follow all proper procedures, and an untrained or uninformed manager may still violate the law, resulting in costly consequences.


In this article’s Atlanta, Georgia, case study, the Georgia Department of Public Health wrongly denied the employee’s request for FMLA leave, believing the employee’s condition did not qualify for leave. As a result of the denied leave request, the employee was disciplined and subsequently terminated due to absences related to their FMLA-qualified condition. Employers must be aware of conditions that qualify for FMLA leave to avoid wrongfully disciplining or terminating otherwise protected employees.


FMLA violations can be particularly costly, as they may involve paying back employees’ lost wages and reinstating lost benefits. Employers need to ensure managers, employees and other stakeholders understand their FMLA rights. This includes knowing how to submit FMLA requests, understanding situations that might qualify for FMLA leave and comprehending workplace guarantees that come with this leave (e.g., job protection). Understanding these details can help prevent wrongful termination and significant monetary penalties.

 

Conclusion

These wage and hour violation case studies demonstrate how easy it can be for an employer to face challenges related to wage and hour regulations. That’s why it’s so important for employers to seek professional guidance before making potentially costly decisions. By learning from these employers’ mistakes, others in similar industries can avoid major violations and prevent DOL audits.

Sign up for our newsletter.

January 7, 2025
As 2025 kicks off, the HR landscape is evolving faster than ever before. Technology, shifting workforce expectations, and the need for businesses to be agile in a dynamic global environment are all driving change. What worked yesterday may not be enough today, and companies must adapt to stay ahead. Here are the top five HR trends you’ll need to watch closely in 2025: 1. AI is Changing the Hiring Game Artificial intelligence is no longer just a buzzword in HR—it’s a game-changer. Tools that can scan resumes, match candidates to roles, and even conduct initial assessments are becoming staples for businesses aiming to save time and improve hiring outcomes. In 2024, many organizations began integrating AI to remove unconscious bias and make their hiring practices more inclusive, and this trend is expected to accelerate. 2. Flexibility Isn’t Just a Perk Anymore Hybrid and remote work models are here to stay, but the conversation has shifted. In 2025, it’s less about offering flexibility and more about making it work effectively. Companies are adopting sophisticated tools for remote collaboration, redefining performance metrics, and ensuring policies address the nuances of managing both in-office and remote teams. The focus is on maintaining productivity without compromising employee well-being. 3. Wellness Goes Beyond Gym Memberships In recent years, wellness programs have evolved beyond basic offerings like gym memberships to address a wider range of employee needs. As companies recognize the link between employee well-being and productivity, they’re broadening their focus to include mental health, financial stability, and holistic support. In 2023 and 2024, for example, Delta expanded its employee wellness initiatives by improving access to mental health care. The airline worked with Spring Health, a new EAP provider, to create a larger and more diverse network of mental health professionals, offering better support for both employees and their household members. Looking ahead to 2025, wellness will become more deeply integrated into company cultures. Expect companies to go beyond providing reactive support to fostering proactive wellness through personalized tools, such as mental health apps, financial coaching, and enhanced benefits like paid leave for caregiving. With these programs, businesses are not just addressing immediate health concerns but also empowering employees to manage their overall well-being in a more holistic way. The focus will be on creating a supportive, sustainable work environment that helps employees thrive both at work and in their personal lives. 4. Upskilling is a Competitive Necessity Technology is evolving faster than ever, and companies are racing to keep up. Upskilling employees in areas like data analysis, AI, and emerging tech became a priority in 2024, and it’s clear that this trend will only grow. Businesses that invest in continuous learning programs—whether through certifications, on-the-job training, or digital learning platforms—are better positioned to stay ahead in their industries. 5. Data is Driving HR Decisions HR is leaning heavily on people analytics to guide decision-making. Instead of relying on intuition, businesses are using data to understand employee engagement, pinpoint reasons for turnover, and improve productivity. The emphasis on metrics like employee sentiment and workforce utilization gained traction last year, and more organizations are embedding analytics into their HR strategies to tackle challenges proactively. Final Thoughts The HR landscape in 2025 will be shaped by these transformative trends. Businesses that embrace innovation and prioritize their people will find themselves not just adapting but thriving in the evolving workplace. As these trends unfold, staying proactive and flexible will be the key to turning challenges into opportunities.
January 6, 2025
The IRS has released the 2025 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) fee , which will increase to $3.47 per covered life —a $0.25 increase from 2024. This fee applies to plan years ending on or after October 1, 2024 , and before October 1, 2025 . What is the PCORI Fee? The PCORI fee was introduced as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to help fund the research conducted by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). This research focuses on improving healthcare outcomes by comparing different medical treatments. The fee is levied on insurers, as well as self-insured and level-funded health plans. The fee is calculated based on the average number of covered lives under a plan and is due once a year, with the filing occurring during the second quarter on Form 720 , the Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return . The payment is due by July 31 each year. Key Details for Employers and Plan Sponsors Who is Affected? : The fee applies to health insurers, self-insured health plans, and level-funded health plans. When is it Due? : The fee must be reported on Form 720 and paid by July 31 each year. How is it Calculated? : The fee is based on the average number of covered lives during the plan year. The updated $3.47 per covered life fee will be in effect for health plans with policy years ending between October 1, 2024, and October 1, 2025. Employers should be prepared to account for this increase when filing for 2025. For more information on the PCORI fee and its reporting requirements, consult the IRS Bulletin 2024-49 , published on December 2, 2024, or visit the IRS PCORI Fee page . 
January 6, 2025
In a move welcomed by many employers in the hospitality and service industries, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has officially reinstated the pre-2021 tip credit rule. This change, effective December 17, 2024, follows a recent court of appeals decision that vacated the “80/20/30” tip credit rule that had been implemented under the Trump administration. If you’re wondering what this means for your business, don’t worry—this update doesn’t require any immediate action on your part. What Was the "80/20/30" Rule? Before we dive into the implications of the DOL’s latest rule change, let’s quickly review the "80/20/30" rule. This rule, introduced in 2021, placed specific restrictions on how much time tipped employees (such as waitstaff and bartenders) could spend on non-tip-generating duties (e.g., cleaning, setting up, and other side work). The rule essentially required that tipped workers spend at least 80% of their work hours on tip-generating activities to continue qualifying for the tip credit. Moreover, under the "80/20/30" rule, employers could no longer use the tip credit to offset wages for certain non-tip-producing activities, and they had to ensure that employees spent no more than 30 minutes at a time on side duties. This increased the burden on employers, as it required more careful tracking of employee duties and work hours to remain in compliance. Why Was the Rule Vacated? The court of appeals decision in August 2024 ruled that the "80/20/30" rule was too restrictive and inconsistent with the intent of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which allows employers to take a tip credit for workers who perform both tipped and non-tipped duties. The court found that the new rule created unreasonable administrative burdens and restrictions that were not in line with past practices or legal precedents. In response to this ruling, the DOL moved quickly to restore the pre-2021 tip credit rule. What Does the Reinstatement of the Pre-2021 Rule Mean for Employers? With the reinstatement of the pre-2021 tip credit rule, the DOL has effectively simplified the way employers can apply the tip credit to their workers. Under the prior rule, employees who perform a combination of tipped and non-tipped duties can still qualify for the tip credit, as long as their primary job responsibility is related to tipped work. Employers no longer have to track the precise breakdown of time spent on tip-generating vs. non-tip-generating activities in the same way. This returns to the more flexible guidelines where as long as tipped employees perform "related" duties (e.g., cleaning their station, setting up for service), they can still receive the tip credit for those hours, provided those activities don’t dominate their workday. What Action Is Needed from Employers? For most employers, this change will not require any immediate action, as the final rule effectively restores the pre-2021 approach. The main thing to note is that employers should continue to comply with the broader requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and ensure they are properly paying employees at least the federal minimum wage (including tips) when they apply the tip credit. Here are a few things to keep in mind: Reassess Timekeeping Systems: While the rule change simplifies some aspects of record-keeping, employers still need to ensure they have a timekeeping system in place that accurately tracks the hours worked by tipped employees. It is essential to ensure that the wages (base pay plus tips) equal at least the federal minimum wage. No Need for Immediate Adjustments: If you were already applying the pre-2021 tip credit rule, no changes are necessary on your part. For those who had adjusted to the "80/20/30" rule, reverting back to the previous method should not require significant changes. State and Local Laws: Employers should still be mindful of any state or local laws that may have stricter requirements than federal law. Always check your state’s labor regulations to ensure full compliance. Why Is This Change Important? The reinstatement of the simplified tip credit rule provides relief to many employers, particularly in industries like restaurants, hotels, and other service-based businesses where tipping is common. The pre-2021 rule is seen as more employer-friendly, offering more flexibility in how tipped employees can spend their time without losing eligibility for the tip credit. For employers, this means less administrative burden, reduced risk of compliance issues, and potentially fewer legal challenges. This shift is a step toward simplifying labor law compliance for businesses already struggling with the complexities of wage and hour rules. Looking Ahead As we move further into 2025, it’s important for employers to stay informed of any future changes in federal labor regulations. While this change restores a previous rule, the DOL’s stance on tip credits and wage issues can continue to evolve. Employers in tip-dependent industries should continue to monitor updates from the Department of Labor and legal rulings to ensure ongoing compliance. The DOL’s restoration of the pre-2021 tip credit rule is a welcome change for many businesses, offering a return to simpler guidelines and less restrictive requirements. For most employers, no immediate action is required, but it’s always a good idea to review your practices to ensure they align with the updated rule. If you need further assistance in navigating these changes, reach out to Simco to ensure your business stays compliant in 2025 and beyond. 

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: