Strategies to Improve Hiring Outcomes
July 26, 2023

As employers struggled to respond to trends such as the Great Resignation and quiet quitting, many quickly hired employees to cut costs and fill open positions. Unfortunately, reactionary hiring often didn’t work for either party. According to a USA Today poll, only 26% of job switchers liked their new position enough to stay. For this reason, many employers are shifting their focus to prioritize the quality of new hires and evaluate how their recruitment and onboarding practices can lead to more positive hiring outcomes. 


This article provides guidance on the importance of hiring outcomes and strategies employers can use to find the right employees for open positions and improve such outcomes.

Hiring Outcomes

A successful hiring outcome occurs when an employer hires the right individual for an open position. The measurements of successful hiring may vary depending on an organization’s goals and objectives. Generally, standard measures of positive hiring outcomes include employee performance, job satisfaction and organizational loyalty. A negative hiring outcome can occur when an organization hires an individual that’s ill-suited for the position or is not a good cultural fit.

The Importance of Hiring Outcomes

When the wrong person is hired, it can have numerous consequences for an organization. According to Northwestern University, a bad hiring decision can cost a company at least 30% of that employee’s annual salary. Hiring the wrong people can also reduce employee morale, damage company culture, increase employee turnover, damage employer branding and create unsafe workplaces. 


On the other hand, when an employee is a good fit for their position and organization, they’re more likely to be productive, loyal and remain with their company for longer. This ultimately benefits revenue by reducing hiring and onboarding costs and keeping knowledgeable, productive employees at the company. 

Improving Hiring Outcomes

Employers’ strategies are critical to ensuring organizations consistently hire employees that align with organizational goals. Here are strategies for employers to consider:


  • Focus on fit. A recent survey found that more than half (55%) of people lie on their resumes. Therefore, it’s crucial that employers find ways to establish a candidate’s trustworthiness. Common methods include reference checks, skills assessments and behavioral-based interviewing. Additionally, employers should pay attention to how well an individual aligns with an organization’s goals and desires, not just the qualifications listed on their resume. It may be beneficial to observe how job applicants interact with other people in the office to understand how an individual would interact with team members and contribute to company culture.
  • Be transparent. Communicate regularly and clearly with job applicants during interviews and hiring. This will improve trust and make them feel valued by an organization. Employers should also honestly describe job expectations and organizational goals to help candidates make informed decisions about job positions. Listing pay ranges alongside job postings is another way to establish trust and increase efficiency, as it reduces the risk of losing job candidates over salary expectations far along in the hiring process. In fact, workers are more likely to apply for jobs that include a pay range in the job posting, according to recent data from global employment website Monster. This can increase an employer’s talent pool and ultimately lead to better hiring outcomes.   
  • Emphasize diversity. Diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) is a critical element many employees consider when deciding to stay with a company. A survey by Goodhire found that 81% of employees would consider leaving their job if their employer wasn’t committed to DE&I. In addition to helping attract and retain employees, a commitment to DE&I can also improve an organization’s bottom line. According to management consulting company McKinsey, diverse and inclusive companies are 35% more likely to outperform competitors financially. 
  • Assess recruitment strategy. Recruitment methods factor into the type of candidates applying for open positions. Recent research by software company Yello found that 54% of Generation Z workers won’t complete a job application if the method is outdated. Simplifying the application process with technology like mobile-friendly applications and applicant tracking systems can help employers compete for talent. 
  • Consider temporary-to-permanent (temp-to-perm) hiring. With this type of hiring, employers hire workers on a temporary basis for a trial employment period before hiring decisions are finalized. This enables employers to fill positions without committing to permanent employment, reducing the risk of poor hiring decisions. However, employers who use this method of hiring should be aware of the potential drawbacks, such as agency fees, less committed workers and insufficient training for temporary hires. 
  • Use artificial intelligence (AI). Although a relatively new technology, AI can help evaluate and screen potential candidates. It can improve candidate experience and increase efficiency and fairness. However, employers who use AI for hiring processes should also be aware of potential accessibility issues, as it may intentionally or unintentionally screen out job seekers with disabilities. Unintentional discrimination may occur if an AI algorithm relies on historical data sets that use benchmarking resumes and other job requirements that are biased or discriminatory.

Employer Takeaway

As labor market conditions shift, employers should assess their hiring and recruiting strategies to improve positive outcomes. Employers who prioritize hiring the right person the first time may experience reduced employee turnover, improved company culture and increased revenue.


For more workplace information, contact SimcoHR today.

Sign up for our newsletter.

February 3, 2025
Overview of the New Ruling New York employers are once again required to provide a notice in their employee handbooks about reproductive health rights following a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The ruling vacated a previous permanent injunction that had blocked the enforcement of the law, meaning employers must now comply with the New York Reproductive Health Bias Law (Labor Law § 203-e). Reproductive Health Bias Law Requirements The Reproductive Health Bias Law was enacted in November 2019 to ensure employees and their dependents can make reproductive health decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace. The law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees regarding their reproductive health decisions and requires employers to keep employees' reproductive health information confidential unless there is prior written consent. Under the law, employers must include a notice in their employee handbooks informing employees of their rights and remedies under the Act. This is an essential update that must be made to comply with the law. Impact of the Second Circuit Ruling Religious organizations had challenged the law, arguing that the notice requirement violated their First Amendment rights. However, the Second Circuit disagreed, ruling that the notice requirement was lawful and similar to other workplace disclosure laws. The court noted that while the policy motivating the law may be controversial, the law itself and the obligation for employers to comply are not in question. Action Required for Employers Even though there is no specific penalty for failing to comply with the notice requirement, employers are encouraged to review and update their employee handbooks in light of the court's ruling to ensure they are compliant with the law. For Simco Clients: For clients who utilize Simco’s employee handbook services, rest assured this requirement is already included, and no additional steps are needed.
February 1, 2025
Pre-employment drug testing is a hiring practice that has sparked debate in recent years. While some industries rely on it for safety and compliance, others are rethinking its necessity—especially as marijuana laws evolve. If you're actively job searching, knowing what to expect can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and understand your rights. Who Still Requires Drug Testing? Not all industries conduct pre-employment drug testing, but for certain roles, it's still a non-negotiable requirement. Some of the most common sectors where testing remains standard include: Transportation & Public Safety – Truck drivers, pilots, transit operators, and law enforcement Healthcare & Childcare – Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and daycare providers Government & Military Contracts – Federal employees, military personnel, and defense contractors Manufacturing & Construction – Heavy equipment operators and industrial workers handling hazardous materials However, policies vary widely even within these industries. Some companies are now loosening restrictions for non-safety-sensitive positions, recognizing that outdated drug testing policies may limit their talent pool. What Substances Are Typically Screened? Most pre-employment drug tests screen for common illicit substances, but the depth of testing can vary. Standard screenings include: Five-Panel Test – Detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and PCP Expanded Panel Tests – Can include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, synthetic opioids, and even alcohol Employers may use different types of tests, including urine, saliva, blood, or hair follicle analysis. Hair follicle testing, for example, can detect drug use from months prior—something applicants should be mindful of. The Evolving Landscape of Marijuana Testing One of the most significant changes in pre-employment drug testing involves marijuana. With over half of U.S. states legalizing marijuana in some form, companies are reevaluating their stance. Some states prohibit employers from disqualifying candidates for off-duty marijuana use. Other states still allow testing but require employers to prove impairment, not just presence. Federally regulated positions, such as those in transportation, maintain strict no-tolerance policies. This shift means that while some applicants may no longer face automatic disqualification for marijuana use, it’s still important to know an employer’s policy before assuming it won’t impact hiring decisions. What Happens If You Fail a Pre-Employment Drug Test? The consequences of failing a drug test depend on multiple factors, including company policy, industry regulations, and state laws. In regulated industries (e.g., transportation, healthcare, federal employment), a failed test almost always results in immediate disqualification. Some employers allow re-testing or a waiting period before reapplying, particularly for marijuana use in certain states. If you have a valid prescription for a tested substance (e.g., opioids or ADHD medication), you may need to provide documentation to avoid disqualification. Additionally, some companies offer assistance programs or second-chance policies, especially if an applicant is upfront about past use or addiction recovery. Do Employers Really Benefit from Drug Testing? With the workforce evolving, many companies are questioning whether traditional drug testing policies still serve their intended purpose. Some argue that testing reduces liability, improves workplace safety, and ensures reliable employees. However, others believe that outdated policies exclude qualified candidates, especially in a competitive job market. The Arguments for Drug Testing: Reduces workplace accidents in safety-sensitive roles Ensures compliance with federal and industry regulations Discourages drug use in high-responsibility positions The Arguments Against Drug Testing: May eliminate qualified candidates for non-safety-sensitive roles Does not account for impairment vs. past use (especially with marijuana) Can be costly and time-consuming for employers Companies that still require drug testing must weigh these factors and ensure their policies align with modern workforce expectations. The Future of Pre-Employment Drug Testing The debate over drug testing isn’t going away anytime soon. As laws and attitudes continue shifting, companies may move toward impairment-based testing rather than zero-tolerance screening. This means job seekers should stay informed, especially in industries where testing is likely to remain a requirement. For now, the best approach is to understand employer expectations, know your legal protections, and be prepared for potential screenings as part of the hiring process.
January 30, 2025
Workplace Posting for Form 300A Begins February 1 Employers with 11 or more employees at any point in 2024 must display the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, from February 1 to April 30. Even if no recordable incidents occurred in 2024, this posting is mandatory. The form must be certified by a company executive and displayed prominently in each workplace where employee notices are typically posted. Certain businesses are exempt from OSHA’s regular recordkeeping requirements, including this posting, if they employ 10 or fewer people or if their primary business activity is considered low hazard according to OSHA's guidelines. A full list of low-hazard industries, categorized by NAICS codes, is available here . However, even exempt companies must report fatalities or incidents resulting in hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. Electronic Submission of Form 300A Due by March 2 Businesses with 250 or more employees from the previous year, or those with 20-249 employees in high-risk industries, must submit their Form 300A data electronically through OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA) by March 2, 2025. This requirement applies based on the number of employees at a specific location, not the entire company. Employers under State Plans are also required to submit electronically. Exemptions from this electronic submission apply to employers who: Are exempt from OSHA's regular recordkeeping rules. Had fewer than 20 employees in the past year. Had between 20 and 249 employees but aren’t in the designated high-risk industries. Additional resources, FAQs, and access to the ITA are available on OSHA’s ITA page . Submission of Forms 300 and 301 Required by March 2 Employers in high-hazard industries with 100 or more employees are required to submit data from both their Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) through the ITA, in addition to their Form 300A submission. Help with Coverage Determination Employers can use OSHA’s ITA Coverage Application to assess whether they need to submit injury and illness data electronically or refer to the State Plan for specific reporting requirements.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: