Preparing for the New Form I-9
August 9, 2023
Preparing for the New Form I-9

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently announced the release of an updated Employment Eligibility Verification form (Form I-9) and instructions. The updated Form I-9 will be available to employers starting August 1, 2023; however, the prior version of Form I-9 (Revised October 21, 2019) continues to be effective through October 31, 2023. After October 31, employers who continue to use the outdated Form I-9 will be subject to penalties. The revisions to the form and its instructions are intended to streamline the documents and reduce the burdens associated with the form for employers and employees.

The DHS also 
issued a final rule to become effective on Aug. 1, 2023, which will amend agency regulations to allow for the authorization of alternative document examination procedures, such as remote documentation verification and examination. The new rule is designed to increase flexibility and improve the agency’s ability to respond to emergencies, such as a pandemic similar to COVID-19.

These announcements have been long-awaited after previous extensions of the existing form and temporary COVID-19 flexibilities allowing remote verification. As these changes will impact all employers, now is a critical time to ensure that organizations are familiar with them, review their Form I-9 practices and make any necessary adjustments. Accordingly, this article provides employers with an overview of the changes to Form I-9 and remote document verification and outlines strategies to help employers prepare for the new form.
 

Form I-9 Overview

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) requires all employers, regardless of size, to hire only individuals who may legally work in the United States. To comply with the law, employers must verify each individual's identity and employment authorization by completing and retaining the Form I-9.
 

Form I-9 Updates

The USCIS released the following updates to Form I-9:


  • Reduced Sections 1 and 2 to a single sheet;
  • Moved the Preparer/Translator Certification area from Section 1 to a standalone supplement (Supplement A);
  • Moved the Reverification and Rehire area from Section 3 to a separate supplement (Supplement B);
  • Replaced the use of “alien authorized to work” with “noncitizen authorized to work;” 
  • Clarified the difference between “noncitizen national” and “noncitizen authorized to work;"
  • Ensured the form can be downloaded easily and filled out on tablets and mobile devices;
  • Eliminated the requirement to enter “N/A” in certain fields;
  • Revised the notice that explains how to avoid discrimination in the Form I-9 process;
  • Updated the List of Acceptable Documents page to include guidance and links to information on automatic extensions of employment authorization documentation and some acceptable receipts; and
  • Added a check box to use if the employee’s Form I-9 documentation was examined under a DHS-authorized alternative procedure rather than a physical examination.


Additionally, the USCIS updated Form I-9’s instructions. These updates include the following:


  • Reduced the instruction’s length from 15 pages to eight pages;
  • Included definitions of key actors in the Form I-9 process;
  • Simplified the steps each actor takes to complete their section of the form;
  • Added instructions for the use of the new checkbox for employers who choose to examine Form I-9 documentation under an alternative procedure; and
  • Eliminated the abbreviations charts and moved them to the USCIS’ Handbook for Employers.


Completing the Updated Form I-9

To comply with employment eligibility verification requirements, employers can use the updated Form I-9 starting August 1, 2023. Employers do not need to complete the new form for current employees with a properly completed Form I-9 on file unless reverification applies after October 31, 2023. 


Employers may continue using the prior version of the form through October 1, 2023. The USCIS is allowing employers this additional time to make necessary updates and adjustments to their business processes. After October 1, 2023, the prior version of Form I-9 will be obsolete and no longer valid. Starting November 1, 2023, employers who fail to use the updated form may be subjected to all applicable penalties under section 274A of IRCA. Employers may download the current version of the form on the USCIS’ website. Starting August 1, 2023, the new form will be available on the USCIS’ website.


Preparing for the Updated Form I-9

Complying with Form I-9 requirements is often challenging and places a large administrative burden on employers. Failing to complete and retain Forms I-9 for all employees can be extremely costly. Under the IRCA, employers can be subjected to fines for not complying with Form I-9 guidelines, accepting fraudulent documents when verifying an employee’s identity and employment eligibility, and discriminating against individuals based on their citizenship status or national origin. Additionally, Form I-9 violations often can lead to additional fines and penalties from other government agencies.

While the required timelines for completing Forms I-9 for employees haven’t changed, the updated form will likely force employers to make some changes to their Form I-9 operations and processes; therefore, it’s critical that employers familiarize themselves with the new form and its changes so they can ensure an efficient and effective Form I-9 process and avoid costly penalties. Employers can consider the following strategies to help ensure they meet the Oct. 31 deadline and comply with Form I-9 requirements.
 

Remote Document Verification

The USCIS also announced a final rule in the Federal Register recognizing the end of temporary COVID-19 flexibilities on July 31, 2023. The final rule also provides the DHS the authority to authorize optional alternatives for employers to examine Form I-9 documentation.

Under current requirements, employers must physically inspect Form I-9 acceptable documents to certify that their employees are authorized to work in the United States; however, with the final rule, the DHS also published an accompanying document in the Federal Register providing employers enrolled in E-Verify the option to remotely examine their employees’ identity and employment authorization documents under a DHS authorized alternative procedure.
The remote verification option will not be available to employers unless they enroll in E-Verify. 

To participate in the remote examination of Form I-9 documents under the DHS-authorized alternative procedure, employers will need to:


  • Be enrolled in E-Verify;
  • Examine and retain copies of all documents;
  • Conduct a live video interaction with the employee; and
  • Create an E-Verify case if the employee is a new hire.


Employers who were participating in E-Verify and created a case for employees whose documents were examined during COVID-19 flexibilities (March 20, 2020, to July 31, 2023) may choose to use the new alternative procedure starting on August 1, 2023, to satisfy the physical document examination requirements by August 30, 2023. Employers not enrolled in E-Verify during the COVID-19 flexibilities must complete an in-person verification by August 30, 2023.

Form I-9 requirements impact all employers; therefore, with these fast-moving and even confusing changes, now is a critical time for employers to review their Form I-9 processes. By understanding Form I-9 requirement changes and the implementation timelines, employers can better prepare to comply with these new requirements.

Contact SimcoHR today for additional Form I-9 resources or questions.

Sign up for our newsletter.

March 10, 2026
By early spring, most organizations have settled into the rhythm of the new year. Payroll cycles are running, benefits elections have taken effect, and hiring plans are starting to move forward. It is also around this time that small administrative issues tend to surface. A deduction that was entered incorrectly. A PTO balance that does not quite look right. A job description that no longer reflects what someone actually does day to day. None of these problems usually start out as major concerns. But when they go unnoticed for months, they can create compliance risks, payroll corrections, or frustrating employee experiences later in the year. Taking a little time now to review a few core HR and payroll areas can help catch issues early and keep your systems running the way they should. 1. Payroll Deductions and Employee Pay Accuracy Payroll errors rarely happen because someone intentionally entered the wrong information. More often they occur because small changes throughout the year were not reflected consistently across systems. Spring is a good time to review payroll deductions line by line and make sure everything matches current elections and agreements. Start by checking: Health, dental, and vision deductions against current benefit elections Retirement contributions and employer match calculations Garnishments or wage attachments that may have started or ended Bonus or commission structures tied to payroll calculations It is also worth confirming that salary adjustments made at the start of the year were properly applied across payroll and HR records. A mismatch between HR systems and payroll can create issues that compound over time. Run a payroll audit report if your system allows it. Compare gross wages, deductions, and net pay for a sampling of employees across departments. Look for unusual fluctuations or rounding inconsistencies. Even one small discrepancy can create confusion for employees and require retroactive corrections later. 2. PTO Balances and Accrual Policies Paid time off policies can quietly become inconsistent if they are not reviewed periodically. Accrual rules may have changed, new hires may have different policies than long-tenured employees, and carryover limits can easily be overlooked. Take time this spring to verify that PTO balances reflect the rules outlined in your employee handbook. Focus on questions such as: Are accrual rates being applied correctly based on tenure? Are carryover limits being enforced as expected? Have any manual adjustments been made that need documentation? Do employees clearly understand how their PTO accumulates and resets? This review also helps identify employees who may have unusually high PTO balances. Addressing those early can help avoid operational challenges later in the year when many employees begin using vacation time. 3. Employee Classification and Job Roles Misclassification remains one of the most common compliance risks employers face. Over time, job responsibilities evolve, and a position that once qualified for a particular classification may no longer meet the criteria. Use this time to review whether employees are properly classified as exempt or non-exempt under wage and hour laws. Look closely at: Employees who received promotions or expanded responsibilities Positions that involve supervisory duties Roles that combine administrative and operational tasks Job descriptions should accurately reflect what employees actually do day to day. If responsibilities have shifted significantly, the classification may need to be reevaluated. Clear documentation is important here. Updated job descriptions help support classification decisions and provide clarity for both employees and managers. 4. Employee Handbook and Workplace Policies Policies that felt current a year ago may now need adjustments. Workplace expectations evolve quickly, and spring is a practical time to review whether your handbook reflects the way your organization actually operates. Pay particular attention to policies related to: Remote or hybrid work expectations Use of artificial intelligence tools in the workplace Timekeeping and attendance procedures Workplace conduct and communication standards It is also wise to confirm that any state-specific policies remain compliant with current regulations. If your workforce spans multiple states, small policy differences may need to be addressed. Updating a handbook does not necessarily mean rewriting the entire document. Sometimes a few targeted revisions can ensure employees have clear guidance and leadership has consistent standards to follow. 5. Benefits Eligibility and Employee Status Changes Benefits eligibility errors can happen when employee status changes are not updated in a timely manner. Review employees who experienced changes during the past several months. This includes individuals who moved from part-time to full-time status, those who returned from leave, and employees who changed departments or compensation structures. Make sure eligibility for benefits matches the organization’s plan requirements. Check that: Newly eligible employees were offered enrollment opportunities Terminated employees were removed from benefit plans promptly COBRA notifications were issued when required Dependent eligibility rules are being followed consistently Even minor oversights in this area can create complications with carriers or leave employees temporarily without the coverage they expect. 6. Workers’ Compensation Classifications Workers’ compensation classifications often remain unchanged year after year, even when job duties evolve. If employees begin performing different tasks than originally described, their classification may no longer match the level of risk associated with the role. Incorrect classifications can lead to inaccurate premium calculations and potential audit findings later. Take time to review job roles that involve: Operational or physical work environments Field service or travel responsibilities Equipment use or safety considerations Confirm that the workers’ compensation codes associated with these positions still reflect the work being performed. Employers who review this annually are often better prepared when insurance audits occur. 7. HR and Payroll System Alignment Finally, look at how your HR and payroll systems interact with each other . Many organizations rely on multiple platforms for HR, payroll, benefits administration, and reporting. When systems do not communicate effectively, teams often compensate by manually transferring data between them. That can create hidden inefficiencies and increase the chance of errors. Ask yourself: Are employee records consistent across all systems? Are onboarding updates automatically reflected in payroll and benefits platforms? Are reporting tools pulling accurate workforce data? For some employers, this review reveals that processes have become more manual than intended. Working with a partner that integrates HR, payroll, benefits, and insurance services can make much of this coordination significantly easier. At Simco , we help employers align these systems so information flows more smoothly and administrative teams spend less time reconciling data. A Small Review Now Prevents Bigger Issues Later Spring reviews do not have to be complicated or time-consuming. Even a few focused hours reviewing payroll accuracy, employee classifications, and benefits records can uncover issues that are much easier to fix now than later in the year. Employers who take time to review these areas early often avoid the mid-year scramble that happens when small inconsistencies finally surface. A short operational check-in today can help ensure the rest of the year runs more smoothly for both your leadership team and your employees.
March 5, 2026
Auto insurance is something most people set up once and rarely revisit. As long as the policy is active and premiums are paid, it’s easy to assume everything is working as it should. But over time, vehicles change, driving habits evolve, and insurance needs shift. Many drivers unknowingly make small decisions that can leave them underprotected, overpaying, or surprised when a claim occurs. Here are five common auto insurance mistakes drivers make without realizing it, and how a quick review of your coverage can help prevent them. 1. Carrying Only the State Minimum Coverage Many drivers assume that if they meet their state’s minimum insurance requirements, they’re fully protected. In reality, minimum coverage is typically designed to satisfy legal requirements, not necessarily to protect you financially in a serious accident. For example, New York requires drivers to carry at least: $10,000 for property damage for a single crash $25,000 for bodily injury (and $50,000 for death) for one person in a crash $50,000 for bodily injury (and $100,000 for death) for two or more people in a crash These limits allow a vehicle to be legally registered and operated in New York State, but they may not fully cover the costs associated with a major accident, particularly as medical expenses and vehicle repair costs continue to rise. Because of this, many drivers choose higher liability limits to better protect their assets in the event of a serious claim. 2. Assuming Your Policy Automatically Keeps Up With Life Changes Insurance policies don’t automatically adjust when life changes. Yet many drivers forget to update their coverage when their circumstances shift. For example, adding a teenage driver to the household, purchasing a newer or more expensive vehicle, or even relocating to a different area can all affect the type and amount of coverage you may need. Common life events that should trigger a policy review include: Moving to a new home or state Adding a new driver to the household Buying or leasing a new vehicle Changing how often or how far you drive Using your vehicle for business or gig work If your insurer isn’t aware of these changes, your coverage may not accurately reflect your current situation, which could create complications or delays if a claim ever occurs. 3. Overlooking the Risk of Being Underinsured A surprising number of drivers carry coverage that is technically valid but insufficient for real-world risks. While the policy may meet legal requirements, it may not fully protect against the financial impact of a serious accident. This is especially important when considering uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage . If another driver causes an accident but does not have insurance, or carries only minimal coverage, these protections may help cover injuries or losses that the at-fault driver’s policy cannot. In situations involving medical bills, lost wages, or long-term injury, the costs can quickly exceed basic policy limits. Without adequate protection in place, drivers may find themselves responsible for expenses they assumed would be covered. 4. Choosing Deductibles Without Reassessing Them Deductibles often get set once and then forgotten. Over time, however, a deductible that once made sense might no longer align with your financial situation or your comfort level with risk. For example: A higher deductible may lower your premium but increase out-of-pocket costs after a claim. A lower deductible may offer more predictable costs during a claim but can result in higher monthly premiums. As vehicles age or financial circumstances change, it may make sense to revisit this balance. Some drivers choose to increase deductibles once they have built savings for emergencies, while others prefer lower deductibles to reduce uncertainty in the event of an accident. Periodically reviewing this choice ensures your policy reflects both your budget and your risk tolerance. 5. Not Reviewing Your Policy Regularly Auto insurance is not meant to be a “set it and forget it” decision. Coverage that made sense a few years ago may no longer reflect your vehicle’s value, your driving habits, or today’s repair and liability costs. Vehicle repair costs, parts availability, and accident-related expenses have all changed significantly in recent years. New vehicle technology, advanced safety systems, and rising labor costs have made repairs more expensive than many drivers realize. Taking a few minutes once a year to review your policy can help ensure your coverage keeps pace with these changes and continues to provide the protection you expect. A Quick Coverage Review Can Make a Big Difference Many auto insurance mistakes aren’t about reckless driving or major oversights. More often, they happen simply because policies are rarely revisited. A quick review can help you: confirm liability limits still make sense evaluate deductibles and coverage options account for life or vehicle changes identify potential gaps before a claim occurs Making Sure Your Coverage Still Fits At Simco Insurance & Wealth Management, our licensed agents review coverage across multiple carriers to help individuals and families find solutions that fit their needs and budget. If it has been a while since you reviewed your auto insurance, taking a fresh look may help ensure your policy still provides the protection you expect. Because when it comes to insurance, the most expensive mistakes are often the ones people never realize they’re making.
February 25, 2026
Over the past few years, employers have adopted more technology, more vendors, and more specialized partners than ever before. On paper, it makes sense. One provider handles payroll. Another manages benefits. A broker oversees commercial insurance. A third-party administrator handles retirement plans. Individually, each relationship may work well. Collectively, however, fragmentation can quietly create inefficiencies, risk, and missed opportunities that compound over time. As organizations grow and workforce expectations evolve, more employers are stepping back and asking a bigger question: Is our current structure helping us move faster, or slowing us down? As an isolved Network Partner, we closely follow industry research and employer sentiment. In isolved’s Second-Annual Business Owner Report, 76% of business owners say owning a business has become more complicated in the past year, with increased costs cited as the leading driver of that complexity. That complexity often does not stem from one single issue. It builds gradually, especially when systems, vendors, and processes are not aligned. Here’s where the hidden costs of disconnected workforce management tend to show up. Administrative Work That Multiplies Instead of Scales When HR, payroll, benefits, insurance, and retirement services live in separate systems, the workload rarely stays separate. Teams often find themselves entering the same employee data into multiple platforms, reconciling discrepancies between systems, coordinating updates across vendors, and serving as the “go-between” when issues arise. What starts as manageable complexity can become operational drag as your organization grows. Instead of scaling efficiently, internal teams spend valuable time maintaining systems that do not talk to one another. In 2026, when speed and agility matter more than ever, duplicated effort is a cost many employers can no longer afford. Errors That Ripple Across Departments Disconnected systems increase the risk of misalignment. A simple change, such as a salary update or benefits adjustment, can require coordination across multiple vendors. When systems are not integrated, even small inconsistencies can lead to: Incorrect payroll deductions Delayed or inaccurate retirement contributions Benefits enrollment discrepancies Insurance classification or coverage gaps These issues are rarely intentional. They are structural. And when they occur, they impact compliance, employee trust, and leadership confidence. The more vendors involved, the more potential points of failure. Limited Visibility into Workforce Data Today’s employers are expected to make data-driven decisions. But when workforce data is scattered across multiple platforms, clarity becomes harder to achieve. Leaders may struggle to accurately analyze total labor costs, forecast benefits spending trends, identify compliance vulnerabilities, or understand retention or engagement patterns. Without a unified view, decision-making becomes reactive instead of strategic. Employers often know they need better insight, but the systems in place make it difficult to access a full picture. The Real Cost Isn’t Just Vendor Fees Fragmentation does not just increase subscription costs. It creates hidden internal expenses that are harder to measure. Consider the cumulative impact of: Hours spent managing vendor relationships Time dedicated to troubleshooting integration gaps Implementation and training for multiple platforms Costs associated with compliance corrections Technology upgrades required to “bridge” disconnected systems Over time, these operational inefficiencies compound. Resources that could support growth initiatives, employee development, or strategic planning are redirected toward maintaining infrastructure. The financial impact is rarely immediate. It builds gradually. Employee Experience Suffers Quietly Employees feel the effects of fragmentation, even if they cannot articulate the cause. They may encounter multiple logins for payroll and benefits information, confusion about whom to contact for support, delays when issues require coordination between vendors, and inconsistent messaging across systems. In today’s environment, where employee experience influences retention and recruitment, friction matters. A disconnected backend often creates a disconnected front-end experience. Why More Employers Are Reconsidering Their Structure In 2026, employers are thinking beyond cost comparisons. They are asking how their workforce infrastructure supports scalability, compliance confidence, data clarity, leadership decision-making, and a seamless employee experience. Integration does not mean sacrificing expertise. It means aligning systems and services so they function together rather than independently. When HR, payroll/HCM, benefits, commercial insurance, and retirement services are coordinated through a unified structure, organizations gain: Reduced duplication of effort Stronger compliance alignment Clearer reporting and analytics More responsive support Greater operational efficiency Most importantly, leaders gain time and visibility to focus on strategy instead of system maintenance. A Strategic Moment to Evaluate Your Model March is often a natural checkpoint. The year is underway. Hiring plans are in motion. Benefits utilization data is emerging. Payroll trends are clearer. This is an ideal time to step back and assess whether your vendor structure is supporting your long-term goals or creating unnecessary friction. If your organization is juggling multiple providers for HR, payroll, benefits, commercial insurance, and retirement services, it may be worth exploring whether a more integrated approach could simplify operations and strengthen outcomes. At Simco , we work with employers who are ready to reduce complexity, improve alignment, and build infrastructure that supports growth rather than slows it down. The hidden costs of fragmentation rarely show up all at once, but addressing them intentionally can create measurable impact across your organization.

Have a question? Get in touch.