Navigating AI for Professionals
August 30, 2024
Navigating AI for Professionals

According to a Glassdoor report, in the year after the launch of ChatGPT, usage of that tool or those like it by professionals in the workplace more than doubled. Are you using an AI tool to help you with your work tasks? Have you considered doing so? If so, read on. There are advantages to be had and risks to note.


The Basics of AI

Artificial intelligence (better known as AI) is an umbrella term for a machine’s ability to make predictions, recommendations, decisions, and perform other tasks that would normally require human intelligence. Generative AI models, for instance, can create text, image, audio, and video in response to user prompts. ChatGPT is a kind of generative AI tool called a large language model. It functions similarly to the text predictor on your text messaging app—the feature that predicts and suggests what your next word will be—but at a much greater scale and with much more sophistication.


It’s important to note that AI is not actually intelligent. It isn’t cognitive or aware. If you asked ChatGPT to give you a compliment, the AI model would say something nice about you, but it wouldn’t mean it. It isn’t capable of feelings, perceptions, or opinions. Given this limitation, AI should not be used as a substitute for human judgment.


The Legal Landscape

All the laws that govern employment still apply when you use AI to help make decisions or take action. Hiring and promotional decisions based on AI must still be free of discrimination. AI used in conjunction with providing and administering employee benefits must comply with the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act (ERISA) for covered employers. Using AI for data analysis must still comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), and other laws. AI does not absolve you of your compliance obligations. As more and more AI solutions enter the market and AI becomes further integrated into the workplace, we can expect more legislative and regulatory activity.


Best Practices

If you decide to leverage AI for HR and compliance purposes, we recommend the following practices:


  • Be diligent when considering and testing AI tools—no AI tool will be perfect, but some may be more reliable than others. Consult with an attorney when vetting AI vendors and reviewing contracts.


  • Maintain the highest level of privacy practices and standards with all information exchanged with an AI tool.


  • Implement and enforce an AI policy or set of guidelines so employees understand how they should and shouldn’t use AI at work.


  • Rely on human expertise to evaluate what AI creates for you. As when using any knowledge-supporting tool (e.g., a search engine), assume it can and will make mistakes.


  • Set aside time to fact check information and materials created by an AI tool and monitor AI use for discriminatory outcomes and other unlawful practices.


  • Make sure any AI product your organization uses aligns with and contributes to your business needs.


  • Keep your actual pain points in mind when thinking about ways to leverage AI tools. Survey employees about aspects of their work they dislike the most and areas of their work they think may benefit from an AI solution.


  • Develop an AI strategy that explains what you’re using AI to accomplish and how you’ll measure success. Periodically evaluate your uses of AI against those goals and metrics. For example, if a goal for using AI is to save time, does using it in fact save time?


  • Be transparent with employees regarding your point of view and intentions related to AI. Not everyone is excited about AI and what it means for their jobs. People have very strong feelings about it, positive and negative. As you develop and implement AI practices, monitor morale, solicit employee feedback, and show your appreciation for it. You’ll likely get more buy-in from employees if they have a say in how AI changes their work.


  • Encourage employees to share how they’re using AI and what’s working and not working. Ensure that everyone feels safe raising concerns, asking for help, or admitting that AI isn’t working as the company may have hoped.


  • Plan for continued education and constant monitoring. AI technology is advancing rapidly. Employees will need regular training as models develop and new laws pass.


  • Continuously monitor federal and state law.


Practices to Avoid

Some practices may spell trouble for your organization. We recommend avoiding the following:


  • Assuming an AI model or its output complies with federal and state laws. When asked to draft a termination letter, for example, an AI tool may produce a letter that cites reasons for the termination that it pulls out of thin air—and those reasons may even be unlawful. Don’t hand over AI generated resources or publish AI produced copy without thoroughly vetting it.


  • Assuming AI’s sources are reliable or real. Just because AI tells you a law, regulation, or court case exists or says a certain thing doesn’t mean it does.


  • Allowing yourself to be persuaded by AI’s confident tone. AI can sound authoritative when what it’s telling you is wrong or completely made up.


  • Relying on AI to make employment-related decisions. AI does not provide you with a “get out of liability free” card.


  • Using AI technology to analyze employee data containing protected health or personally identifiable information.


  • Creating legal or legally required documents with generative AI.


  • Uploading anything into an AI model that you wouldn’t want shared publicly.



  • Replacing human expertise with AI content.


In conclusion, while AI tools can offer significant advantages in streamlining workplace tasks and decision-making, it's crucial to navigate their use with caution. Adhering to legal standards, maintaining privacy, and integrating human oversight are essential to harnessing the benefits of AI responsibly. By approaching AI thoughtfully, organizations can leverage its capabilities while mitigating potential risks and ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.

Sign up for our newsletter.

February 3, 2025
Overview of the New Ruling New York employers are once again required to provide a notice in their employee handbooks about reproductive health rights following a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The ruling vacated a previous permanent injunction that had blocked the enforcement of the law, meaning employers must now comply with the New York Reproductive Health Bias Law (Labor Law § 203-e). Reproductive Health Bias Law Requirements The Reproductive Health Bias Law was enacted in November 2019 to ensure employees and their dependents can make reproductive health decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace. The law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees regarding their reproductive health decisions and requires employers to keep employees' reproductive health information confidential unless there is prior written consent. Under the law, employers must include a notice in their employee handbooks informing employees of their rights and remedies under the Act. This is an essential update that must be made to comply with the law. Impact of the Second Circuit Ruling Religious organizations had challenged the law, arguing that the notice requirement violated their First Amendment rights. However, the Second Circuit disagreed, ruling that the notice requirement was lawful and similar to other workplace disclosure laws. The court noted that while the policy motivating the law may be controversial, the law itself and the obligation for employers to comply are not in question. Action Required for Employers Even though there is no specific penalty for failing to comply with the notice requirement, employers are encouraged to review and update their employee handbooks in light of the court's ruling to ensure they are compliant with the law. For Simco Clients: For clients who utilize Simco’s employee handbook services, rest assured this requirement is already included, and no additional steps are needed.
February 1, 2025
Pre-employment drug testing is a hiring practice that has sparked debate in recent years. While some industries rely on it for safety and compliance, others are rethinking its necessity—especially as marijuana laws evolve. If you're actively job searching, knowing what to expect can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and understand your rights. Who Still Requires Drug Testing? Not all industries conduct pre-employment drug testing, but for certain roles, it's still a non-negotiable requirement. Some of the most common sectors where testing remains standard include: Transportation & Public Safety – Truck drivers, pilots, transit operators, and law enforcement Healthcare & Childcare – Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and daycare providers Government & Military Contracts – Federal employees, military personnel, and defense contractors Manufacturing & Construction – Heavy equipment operators and industrial workers handling hazardous materials However, policies vary widely even within these industries. Some companies are now loosening restrictions for non-safety-sensitive positions, recognizing that outdated drug testing policies may limit their talent pool. What Substances Are Typically Screened? Most pre-employment drug tests screen for common illicit substances, but the depth of testing can vary. Standard screenings include: Five-Panel Test – Detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and PCP Expanded Panel Tests – Can include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, synthetic opioids, and even alcohol Employers may use different types of tests, including urine, saliva, blood, or hair follicle analysis. Hair follicle testing, for example, can detect drug use from months prior—something applicants should be mindful of. The Evolving Landscape of Marijuana Testing One of the most significant changes in pre-employment drug testing involves marijuana. With over half of U.S. states legalizing marijuana in some form, companies are reevaluating their stance. Some states prohibit employers from disqualifying candidates for off-duty marijuana use. Other states still allow testing but require employers to prove impairment, not just presence. Federally regulated positions, such as those in transportation, maintain strict no-tolerance policies. This shift means that while some applicants may no longer face automatic disqualification for marijuana use, it’s still important to know an employer’s policy before assuming it won’t impact hiring decisions. What Happens If You Fail a Pre-Employment Drug Test? The consequences of failing a drug test depend on multiple factors, including company policy, industry regulations, and state laws. In regulated industries (e.g., transportation, healthcare, federal employment), a failed test almost always results in immediate disqualification. Some employers allow re-testing or a waiting period before reapplying, particularly for marijuana use in certain states. If you have a valid prescription for a tested substance (e.g., opioids or ADHD medication), you may need to provide documentation to avoid disqualification. Additionally, some companies offer assistance programs or second-chance policies, especially if an applicant is upfront about past use or addiction recovery. Do Employers Really Benefit from Drug Testing? With the workforce evolving, many companies are questioning whether traditional drug testing policies still serve their intended purpose. Some argue that testing reduces liability, improves workplace safety, and ensures reliable employees. However, others believe that outdated policies exclude qualified candidates, especially in a competitive job market. The Arguments for Drug Testing: Reduces workplace accidents in safety-sensitive roles Ensures compliance with federal and industry regulations Discourages drug use in high-responsibility positions The Arguments Against Drug Testing: May eliminate qualified candidates for non-safety-sensitive roles Does not account for impairment vs. past use (especially with marijuana) Can be costly and time-consuming for employers Companies that still require drug testing must weigh these factors and ensure their policies align with modern workforce expectations. The Future of Pre-Employment Drug Testing The debate over drug testing isn’t going away anytime soon. As laws and attitudes continue shifting, companies may move toward impairment-based testing rather than zero-tolerance screening. This means job seekers should stay informed, especially in industries where testing is likely to remain a requirement. For now, the best approach is to understand employer expectations, know your legal protections, and be prepared for potential screenings as part of the hiring process.
January 30, 2025
Workplace Posting for Form 300A Begins February 1 Employers with 11 or more employees at any point in 2024 must display the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, from February 1 to April 30. Even if no recordable incidents occurred in 2024, this posting is mandatory. The form must be certified by a company executive and displayed prominently in each workplace where employee notices are typically posted. Certain businesses are exempt from OSHA’s regular recordkeeping requirements, including this posting, if they employ 10 or fewer people or if their primary business activity is considered low hazard according to OSHA's guidelines. A full list of low-hazard industries, categorized by NAICS codes, is available here . However, even exempt companies must report fatalities or incidents resulting in hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. Electronic Submission of Form 300A Due by March 2 Businesses with 250 or more employees from the previous year, or those with 20-249 employees in high-risk industries, must submit their Form 300A data electronically through OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA) by March 2, 2025. This requirement applies based on the number of employees at a specific location, not the entire company. Employers under State Plans are also required to submit electronically. Exemptions from this electronic submission apply to employers who: Are exempt from OSHA's regular recordkeeping rules. Had fewer than 20 employees in the past year. Had between 20 and 249 employees but aren’t in the designated high-risk industries. Additional resources, FAQs, and access to the ITA are available on OSHA’s ITA page . Submission of Forms 300 and 301 Required by March 2 Employers in high-hazard industries with 100 or more employees are required to submit data from both their Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) through the ITA, in addition to their Form 300A submission. Help with Coverage Determination Employers can use OSHA’s ITA Coverage Application to assess whether they need to submit injury and illness data electronically or refer to the State Plan for specific reporting requirements.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: