Minimum PTO Policies
February 23, 2023
Minimum PTO Policies

Many employees do not use their allotted paid time off (PTO) despite their employers’ vacation and other leave policies. As a result, some employers are implementing minimum PTO policies to address this challenge. This emerging trend takes standard PTO policies one step further by mandating that employees take off a minimum number of days each year. When done properly, minimum PTO policies can help curb employee burnout, improve workplace productivity and strengthen attraction and retention efforts.


This article explores minimum PTO policies, including the potential benefits and organizational considerations for developing and implementing these policies.


What Is Minimum PTO?

Minimum PTO—also known as mandatory vacation or time off—is a policy that requires employees to take a minimum number of vacation days each year. While minimum PTO policies can vary by duration and the amount of time employees can take off, they generally take the form of an annual time-off minimum. These policies can establish deadlines for employees to use their PTO monthly, quarterly, seasonally or annually. Employees continue to receive their regular wages when taking time off.


Some employers require employees to take a portion of their minimum PTO over multiple consecutive days. This is known as a consecutive-day policy. For example, an employer may require employees to schedule five of their allotted 15 PTO days consecutively. This helps ensure that employees disconnect from work while away from the office, allowing them to use their PTO for something meaningful and return to work recharged. Consecutive day policies may also allow employees to take time off in smaller increments as long as they take one larger block of PTO each year.


Potential Benefits of Minimum PTO

Many savvy employers are transitioning to minimum PTO to help their employees feel happier and more satisfied at work, which can increase workforce productivity and reduce turnover. Minimum PTO not only encourages employees to use their allotted time off, but it can also strengthen organizations. The following sections highlight some benefits of implementing minimum PTO policies.

Improved Employee Well-being

Employees are an organization’s most valuable resource. By requiring employees to use their PTO, employers prioritize their workers’ mental and physical well-being. Minimum PTO can also help organizations strengthen employee loyalty since it can signal to workers that they’re not required to be online or work outside of expected hours. This can lead to employees feeling valued and, therefore, improve morale. Additionally, because minimum PTO policies help employees recharge, they can improve workplace productivity and safety. A rested workforce will likely be more creative, focused and careful. 


Workforce Needs Evaluation

Mandatory PTO allows organizations to evaluate their workforce needs and reveal potential issues. By requiring employees to take time off, employers can learn whether a particular employee is taking on too many responsibilities and if they need to hire additional workers. It can also encourage cross-training by allowing workers to take on new responsibilities and gain experience when their colleagues are away. This can enable knowledge transfer among workers and decrease the risk of losing vital information and experience when an employee leaves. Additionally, since minimum PTO requires all employees to take time off, it can provide employees with opportunities to report workplace issues that they might not otherwise do due to fear or intimidation, such as harassment and bullying.

Reduced Cashflow and Rollover Issues

Minimum PTO policies can provide a positive alternative to use-it-or-lose-it PTO policies. Many regular PTO policies allow employees to cash out or roll over unused PTO at the end of the year. Cash-outs can create cashflow problems for employers, and rollovers can lead to scheduling challenges the following year. Minimum PTO policies can help organizations save money on year-end PTO payoffs by avoiding cash-outs entirely and limiting potential scheduling issues from rollovers.

Alternatives to Unlimited PTO Policies

Unlimited PTO can be a great recruitment tool and may seem ideal for employees, but, in reality, it can be problematic. Employees often struggle to strike a balance between an acceptable amount and an excessive amount of PTO under unlimited policies. As a result, many employees take less time off than they would if their employers adopted minimum PTO policies. As a result, unlimited PTO can cause employee burnout, decreased worker productivity and increased turnover.

Additionally, unlimited PTO policies can be ambiguous or poorly designed, making it more difficult for employees to take time off. Some organizations may have unspoken rules about using unlimited PTO. This is common in industries with demanding work cultures, like banking and finance. These unspoken norms often dissuade employees from taking time off because they may feel unsure or guilty about stepping away from work. By requiring employees to take time off, employers signal to workers and applicants that they value work-life balance, which can improve overall attraction and retention efforts.

Considerations for Implementing Minimum PTO

While minimum PTO can help employees feel happier and more satisfied at work, adopting this approach can create scheduling challenges. Minimum PTO policies require employers to plan ahead because they must address situations where employees may be out for multiple days. In addition to potential scheduling issues, minimum PTO can create hardships for employees by requiring them to increase their workloads when their coworkers are away. This is especially true for small teams and businesses. Employers can address these issues by establishing PTO blackout periods during peak times or predictable busy seasons. They can also train managers to address PTO requests during popular times, such as during the summer and holidays.


When establishing policies regarding PTO usage and blackout periods, employers need to be consistent with how they administer and approve time-off requests. Employers can do this by establishing a written minimum PTO policy that provides employees with details about how to use and request time off. This can include the minimum number of days employees must use each year, whether any days need to be consecutive and the deadlines for using PTO (e.g., monthly, quarterly and annually).


Organizations need to consider how minimum PTO policies may negatively impact employees. Requiring employees to take time off may cause some workers to feel like they’re losing autonomy because their employer is dictating when they must work and when they must take time off. Additionally, forcing employees to take time off can disrupt internal workflow, especially if employees must take time off during the middle of an important project or right before a critical deadline. This could lead to increased stress for employees and create work-related difficulties.


Employers must ensure their minimum PTO policies comply with federal and state law requirements, including timekeeping requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Many states and localities govern how unused PTO must be handled at year-end or when an employee leaves a company. Additionally, legally mandated paid sick leave is becoming more common throughout the United States. Employers need to ensure that their mandatory PTO policies comply with state and local laws regarding paid sick leave.


Summary

Minimum PTO policies can help create a happier and more productive workforce. While requiring employees to take time away from work can benefit employers and employees, it’s vital that employers weigh these policies’ benefits and compliance costs before implementing them to ensure it’s the right decision for their organization.

For more workplace resources, contact SimcoHR today.


Sign up for our newsletter.

New York Employers Must Update Employee Handbooks for Reproductive Health Rights

February 3, 2025
Overview of the New Ruling New York employers are once again required to provide a notice in their employee handbooks about reproductive health rights following a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The ruling vacated a previous permanent injunction that had blocked the enforcement of the law, meaning employers must now comply with the New York Reproductive Health Bias Law (Labor Law § 203-e). Reproductive Health Bias Law Requirements The Reproductive Health Bias Law was enacted in November 2019 to ensure employees and their dependents can make reproductive health decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace. The law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees regarding their reproductive health decisions and requires employers to keep employees' reproductive health information confidential unless there is prior written consent. Under the law, employers must include a notice in their employee handbooks informing employees of their rights and remedies under the Act. This is an essential update that must be made to comply with the law. Impact of the Second Circuit Ruling Religious organizations had challenged the law, arguing that the notice requirement violated their First Amendment rights. However, the Second Circuit disagreed, ruling that the notice requirement was lawful and similar to other workplace disclosure laws. The court noted that while the policy motivating the law may be controversial, the law itself and the obligation for employers to comply are not in question. Action Required for Employers Even though there is no specific penalty for failing to comply with the notice requirement, employers are encouraged to review and update their employee handbooks in light of the court's ruling to ensure they are compliant with the law. For Simco Clients: For clients who utilize Simco’s employee handbook services, rest assured this requirement is already included, and no additional steps are needed.

Pre-Employment Drug Testing: What Job Seekers Need to Know

February 1, 2025
Pre-employment drug testing is a hiring practice that has sparked debate in recent years. While some industries rely on it for safety and compliance, others are rethinking its necessity—especially as marijuana laws evolve. If you're actively job searching, knowing what to expect can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and understand your rights. Who Still Requires Drug Testing? Not all industries conduct pre-employment drug testing, but for certain roles, it's still a non-negotiable requirement. Some of the most common sectors where testing remains standard include: Transportation & Public Safety – Truck drivers, pilots, transit operators, and law enforcement Healthcare & Childcare – Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and daycare providers Government & Military Contracts – Federal employees, military personnel, and defense contractors Manufacturing & Construction – Heavy equipment operators and industrial workers handling hazardous materials However, policies vary widely even within these industries. Some companies are now loosening restrictions for non-safety-sensitive positions, recognizing that outdated drug testing policies may limit their talent pool. What Substances Are Typically Screened? Most pre-employment drug tests screen for common illicit substances, but the depth of testing can vary. Standard screenings include: Five-Panel Test – Detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and PCP Expanded Panel Tests – Can include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, synthetic opioids, and even alcohol Employers may use different types of tests, including urine, saliva, blood, or hair follicle analysis. Hair follicle testing, for example, can detect drug use from months prior—something applicants should be mindful of. The Evolving Landscape of Marijuana Testing One of the most significant changes in pre-employment drug testing involves marijuana. With over half of U.S. states legalizing marijuana in some form, companies are reevaluating their stance. Some states prohibit employers from disqualifying candidates for off-duty marijuana use. Other states still allow testing but require employers to prove impairment, not just presence. Federally regulated positions, such as those in transportation, maintain strict no-tolerance policies. This shift means that while some applicants may no longer face automatic disqualification for marijuana use, it’s still important to know an employer’s policy before assuming it won’t impact hiring decisions. What Happens If You Fail a Pre-Employment Drug Test? The consequences of failing a drug test depend on multiple factors, including company policy, industry regulations, and state laws. In regulated industries (e.g., transportation, healthcare, federal employment), a failed test almost always results in immediate disqualification. Some employers allow re-testing or a waiting period before reapplying, particularly for marijuana use in certain states. If you have a valid prescription for a tested substance (e.g., opioids or ADHD medication), you may need to provide documentation to avoid disqualification. Additionally, some companies offer assistance programs or second-chance policies, especially if an applicant is upfront about past use or addiction recovery. Do Employers Really Benefit from Drug Testing? With the workforce evolving, many companies are questioning whether traditional drug testing policies still serve their intended purpose. Some argue that testing reduces liability, improves workplace safety, and ensures reliable employees. However, others believe that outdated policies exclude qualified candidates, especially in a competitive job market. The Arguments for Drug Testing: Reduces workplace accidents in safety-sensitive roles Ensures compliance with federal and industry regulations Discourages drug use in high-responsibility positions The Arguments Against Drug Testing: May eliminate qualified candidates for non-safety-sensitive roles Does not account for impairment vs. past use (especially with marijuana) Can be costly and time-consuming for employers Companies that still require drug testing must weigh these factors and ensure their policies align with modern workforce expectations. The Future of Pre-Employment Drug Testing The debate over drug testing isn’t going away anytime soon. As laws and attitudes continue shifting, companies may move toward impairment-based testing rather than zero-tolerance screening. This means job seekers should stay informed, especially in industries where testing is likely to remain a requirement. For now, the best approach is to understand employer expectations, know your legal protections, and be prepared for potential screenings as part of the hiring process.

OSHA Form 300A Requirements: Key Deadlines for Employers

January 30, 2025
Workplace Posting for Form 300A Begins February 1 Employers with 11 or more employees at any point in 2024 must display the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, from February 1 to April 30. Even if no recordable incidents occurred in 2024, this posting is mandatory. The form must be certified by a company executive and displayed prominently in each workplace where employee notices are typically posted. Certain businesses are exempt from OSHA’s regular recordkeeping requirements, including this posting, if they employ 10 or fewer people or if their primary business activity is considered low hazard according to OSHA's guidelines. A full list of low-hazard industries, categorized by NAICS codes, is available here . However, even exempt companies must report fatalities or incidents resulting in hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. Electronic Submission of Form 300A Due by March 2 Businesses with 250 or more employees from the previous year, or those with 20-249 employees in high-risk industries, must submit their Form 300A data electronically through OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA) by March 2, 2025. This requirement applies based on the number of employees at a specific location, not the entire company. Employers under State Plans are also required to submit electronically. Exemptions from this electronic submission apply to employers who: Are exempt from OSHA's regular recordkeeping rules. Had fewer than 20 employees in the past year. Had between 20 and 249 employees but aren’t in the designated high-risk industries. Additional resources, FAQs, and access to the ITA are available on OSHA’s ITA page . Submission of Forms 300 and 301 Required by March 2 Employers in high-hazard industries with 100 or more employees are required to submit data from both their Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) through the ITA, in addition to their Form 300A submission. Help with Coverage Determination Employers can use OSHA’s ITA Coverage Application to assess whether they need to submit injury and illness data electronically or refer to the State Plan for specific reporting requirements.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: