How Noncompete Agreements Impact Hiring
June 28, 2024
How Noncompete Agreements Impact Hiring

Noncompete agreements are often viewed as a double-edged sword in hiring and employee management. While they may help safeguard proprietary and confidential information, they can pose hiring challenges.


As such, employers must carefully navigate the complexities of noncompete clauses, balancing their protective benefits with the need to maintain a motivated and mobile workforce. As regulatory landscapes evolve, companies may need to reevaluate their reliance on noncompete agreements and explore alternative strategies for safeguarding their competitive interests. This article explores noncompete agreements, their impact on employers and considerations when drafting them.


Overview of Noncompete Agreements

A noncompete agreement, also known as a restrictive covenant agreement, is a contractual term between an employer and a worker. It blocks the employee from working for a competing employer or starting a competing business, typically within a certain geographic area and period of time after their employment ends. These agreements can protect companies from losing valuable employees and confidential information to competitors and help maintain competitive advantages.


Noncompete agreements are more prevalent in industries such as technology, sales and health care, where sensitive information and specialized skills are crucial. However, enforceability varies by jurisdiction.


Noncompete Bans

The enforceability of a noncompete agreement is generally determined by state and local legislatures and courts. Some states impose strict limitations or outright bans on noncompete clauses.


On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted to issue a final rule prohibiting employers from entering into or enforcing noncompete clauses with most employees. Scheduled to take effect on Sept. 4, 2024, the final rule applies to noncompete agreements with all current and former workers, whether full-time or part-time, including but not limited to employees, independent contractors, interns, externs and apprentices. However, employers should note that the FTC ban will only prohibit post-employment noncompetes. Employers may still restrict current employees from engaging in competitive activities.


The FTC stated that it aims to promote competition by protecting workers' freedom to change jobs, increasing innovation and fostering new business formation.


The Hiring Impact of Noncompetes

The labor market likely will continue to be competitive. Without a noncompete, workers have more freedom to move to another company in the same industry without legal repercussions. As a result, the fight for talent could get even tougher.


As with any workplace decision, using noncompete agreements comes with advantages and drawbacks. Consider the following pros of noncompetes as they relate to employee attraction and retention:


  • Increased employee retention—Noncompetes discourage employees from leaving the organization and working for competitors, which can result in lower turnover rates. Organizations invest heavily in their workers, including onboarding, learning and professional development resources.


  • Maintained competitive advantage—Noncompetes aim to protect sensitive business information, including trade secrets and customer base. Organizational success will likely be achieved by safeguarding company information and relationships that differentiate them from the competition. As such, top talent wants to work for a leading company.


Conversely, here are some talent-related cons of noncompetes for companies to consider:


  • Deterrent to candidates—Job candidates may have concerns about the necessity of noncompetes, causing them to remove themselves from consideration or reject offers.


  • Increased legal liability and costs—Noncompetes are employment contracts with complex rules. Organizations that impose unfair restrictions could face employee lawsuits. Additionally, it can be costly for employers to enforce such agreements. Employee lawsuits also have the potential to damage the employer’s reputation, impacting attraction and retention.


Employer Considerations

First, employers should consider whether a noncompete agreement is legally enforceable in their state. Legal counsel can advise employers on how enforceable a noncompete agreement would be in the company’s location and industry.


Employers can also assess any industry-specific concerns. For example, companies with patented technologies or workers in sales roles may use noncompete agreements. Organizations can also research whether industry competitors require noncompetes with their employees to strengthen attraction and retention efforts. It can be beneficial to remain consistent with the industry, which levels the playing field when competing for talent.


Aside from legality, employers can also consider if noncompete agreements are fair and reasonable to departing employees. When employees who have signed a noncompete leave the company for another job, it’s important for the agreement not to hinder their ability to make a living. Employees may take a new job for many reasons, such as a career progression the current employer couldn’t offer, greater compensation and a more suitable location. Employers should review the terms of their noncompetes to ensure fairness even if the employee is moving to a competitor.


Lastly, being upfront about whether an organization requires new hires to sign noncompete agreements is important. Include that information in job postings or communicate it immediately with candidates so the clause doesn’t become an issue later in the interview or hiring process. Companies may lose good candidates due to noncompetes, but it’s better to have the conversation early on to avoid wasting the time of candidates and recruiting teams. Employers may also keep candidates formerly employed by competitors in the pipeline and reconnect with them after their noncompete has expired.


Summary

Employers need to take many considerations into account before implementing a noncompete agreement while also staying up to date on the latest rules and laws. Furthermore, since noncompete agreements are often the subject of litigation, employers should consult their legal counsel before making any decisions.


Contact Simco for more workplace guidance.

Sign up for our newsletter.

February 3, 2025
Overview of the New Ruling New York employers are once again required to provide a notice in their employee handbooks about reproductive health rights following a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The ruling vacated a previous permanent injunction that had blocked the enforcement of the law, meaning employers must now comply with the New York Reproductive Health Bias Law (Labor Law § 203-e). Reproductive Health Bias Law Requirements The Reproductive Health Bias Law was enacted in November 2019 to ensure employees and their dependents can make reproductive health decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace. The law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees regarding their reproductive health decisions and requires employers to keep employees' reproductive health information confidential unless there is prior written consent. Under the law, employers must include a notice in their employee handbooks informing employees of their rights and remedies under the Act. This is an essential update that must be made to comply with the law. Impact of the Second Circuit Ruling Religious organizations had challenged the law, arguing that the notice requirement violated their First Amendment rights. However, the Second Circuit disagreed, ruling that the notice requirement was lawful and similar to other workplace disclosure laws. The court noted that while the policy motivating the law may be controversial, the law itself and the obligation for employers to comply are not in question. Action Required for Employers Even though there is no specific penalty for failing to comply with the notice requirement, employers are encouraged to review and update their employee handbooks in light of the court's ruling to ensure they are compliant with the law. For Simco Clients: For clients who utilize Simco’s employee handbook services, rest assured this requirement is already included, and no additional steps are needed.
February 1, 2025
Pre-employment drug testing is a hiring practice that has sparked debate in recent years. While some industries rely on it for safety and compliance, others are rethinking its necessity—especially as marijuana laws evolve. If you're actively job searching, knowing what to expect can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and understand your rights. Who Still Requires Drug Testing? Not all industries conduct pre-employment drug testing, but for certain roles, it's still a non-negotiable requirement. Some of the most common sectors where testing remains standard include: Transportation & Public Safety – Truck drivers, pilots, transit operators, and law enforcement Healthcare & Childcare – Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and daycare providers Government & Military Contracts – Federal employees, military personnel, and defense contractors Manufacturing & Construction – Heavy equipment operators and industrial workers handling hazardous materials However, policies vary widely even within these industries. Some companies are now loosening restrictions for non-safety-sensitive positions, recognizing that outdated drug testing policies may limit their talent pool. What Substances Are Typically Screened? Most pre-employment drug tests screen for common illicit substances, but the depth of testing can vary. Standard screenings include: Five-Panel Test – Detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and PCP Expanded Panel Tests – Can include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, synthetic opioids, and even alcohol Employers may use different types of tests, including urine, saliva, blood, or hair follicle analysis. Hair follicle testing, for example, can detect drug use from months prior—something applicants should be mindful of. The Evolving Landscape of Marijuana Testing One of the most significant changes in pre-employment drug testing involves marijuana. With over half of U.S. states legalizing marijuana in some form, companies are reevaluating their stance. Some states prohibit employers from disqualifying candidates for off-duty marijuana use. Other states still allow testing but require employers to prove impairment, not just presence. Federally regulated positions, such as those in transportation, maintain strict no-tolerance policies. This shift means that while some applicants may no longer face automatic disqualification for marijuana use, it’s still important to know an employer’s policy before assuming it won’t impact hiring decisions. What Happens If You Fail a Pre-Employment Drug Test? The consequences of failing a drug test depend on multiple factors, including company policy, industry regulations, and state laws. In regulated industries (e.g., transportation, healthcare, federal employment), a failed test almost always results in immediate disqualification. Some employers allow re-testing or a waiting period before reapplying, particularly for marijuana use in certain states. If you have a valid prescription for a tested substance (e.g., opioids or ADHD medication), you may need to provide documentation to avoid disqualification. Additionally, some companies offer assistance programs or second-chance policies, especially if an applicant is upfront about past use or addiction recovery. Do Employers Really Benefit from Drug Testing? With the workforce evolving, many companies are questioning whether traditional drug testing policies still serve their intended purpose. Some argue that testing reduces liability, improves workplace safety, and ensures reliable employees. However, others believe that outdated policies exclude qualified candidates, especially in a competitive job market. The Arguments for Drug Testing: Reduces workplace accidents in safety-sensitive roles Ensures compliance with federal and industry regulations Discourages drug use in high-responsibility positions The Arguments Against Drug Testing: May eliminate qualified candidates for non-safety-sensitive roles Does not account for impairment vs. past use (especially with marijuana) Can be costly and time-consuming for employers Companies that still require drug testing must weigh these factors and ensure their policies align with modern workforce expectations. The Future of Pre-Employment Drug Testing The debate over drug testing isn’t going away anytime soon. As laws and attitudes continue shifting, companies may move toward impairment-based testing rather than zero-tolerance screening. This means job seekers should stay informed, especially in industries where testing is likely to remain a requirement. For now, the best approach is to understand employer expectations, know your legal protections, and be prepared for potential screenings as part of the hiring process.
January 30, 2025
Workplace Posting for Form 300A Begins February 1 Employers with 11 or more employees at any point in 2024 must display the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, from February 1 to April 30. Even if no recordable incidents occurred in 2024, this posting is mandatory. The form must be certified by a company executive and displayed prominently in each workplace where employee notices are typically posted. Certain businesses are exempt from OSHA’s regular recordkeeping requirements, including this posting, if they employ 10 or fewer people or if their primary business activity is considered low hazard according to OSHA's guidelines. A full list of low-hazard industries, categorized by NAICS codes, is available here . However, even exempt companies must report fatalities or incidents resulting in hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. Electronic Submission of Form 300A Due by March 2 Businesses with 250 or more employees from the previous year, or those with 20-249 employees in high-risk industries, must submit their Form 300A data electronically through OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA) by March 2, 2025. This requirement applies based on the number of employees at a specific location, not the entire company. Employers under State Plans are also required to submit electronically. Exemptions from this electronic submission apply to employers who: Are exempt from OSHA's regular recordkeeping rules. Had fewer than 20 employees in the past year. Had between 20 and 249 employees but aren’t in the designated high-risk industries. Additional resources, FAQs, and access to the ITA are available on OSHA’s ITA page . Submission of Forms 300 and 301 Required by March 2 Employers in high-hazard industries with 100 or more employees are required to submit data from both their Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) through the ITA, in addition to their Form 300A submission. Help with Coverage Determination Employers can use OSHA’s ITA Coverage Application to assess whether they need to submit injury and illness data electronically or refer to the State Plan for specific reporting requirements.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: