Federal DOL Restores Simplified Tip Credit Rule: Employer Guidance
January 6, 2025
Federal DOL Restores Simplified Tip Credit Rule: Employer Guidance

In a move welcomed by many employers in the hospitality and service industries, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has officially reinstated the pre-2021 tip credit rule. This change, effective December 17, 2024, follows a recent court of appeals decision that vacated the “80/20/30” tip credit rule that had been implemented under the Trump administration. If you’re wondering what this means for your business, don’t worry—this update doesn’t require any immediate action on your part.


What Was the "80/20/30" Rule?

Before we dive into the implications of the DOL’s latest rule change, let’s quickly review the "80/20/30" rule. This rule, introduced in 2021, placed specific restrictions on how much time tipped employees (such as waitstaff and bartenders) could spend on non-tip-generating duties (e.g., cleaning, setting up, and other side work). The rule essentially required that tipped workers spend at least 80% of their work hours on tip-generating activities to continue qualifying for the tip credit. 


Moreover, under the "80/20/30" rule, employers could no longer use the tip credit to offset wages for certain non-tip-producing activities, and they had to ensure that employees spent no more than 30 minutes at a time on side duties. This increased the burden on employers, as it required more careful tracking of employee duties and work hours to remain in compliance.


Why Was the Rule Vacated?

The court of appeals decision in August 2024 ruled that the "80/20/30" rule was too restrictive and inconsistent with the intent of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which allows employers to take a tip credit for workers who perform both tipped and non-tipped duties. The court found that the new rule created unreasonable administrative burdens and restrictions that were not in line with past practices or legal precedents. In response to this ruling, the DOL moved quickly to restore the pre-2021 tip credit rule.


What Does the Reinstatement of the Pre-2021 Rule Mean for Employers?

With the reinstatement of the pre-2021 tip credit rule, the DOL has effectively simplified the way employers can apply the tip credit to their workers. Under the prior rule, employees who perform a combination of tipped and non-tipped duties can still qualify for the tip credit, as long as their primary job responsibility is related to tipped work. 


Employers no longer have to track the precise breakdown of time spent on tip-generating vs. non-tip-generating activities in the same way. This returns to the more flexible guidelines where as long as tipped employees perform "related" duties (e.g., cleaning their station, setting up for service), they can still receive the tip credit for those hours, provided those activities don’t dominate their workday.


What Action Is Needed from Employers?

For most employers, this change will not require any immediate action, as the final rule effectively restores the pre-2021 approach. The main thing to note is that employers should continue to comply with the broader requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and ensure they are properly paying employees at least the federal minimum wage (including tips) when they apply the tip credit.


Here are a few things to keep in mind:


  • Reassess Timekeeping Systems: While the rule change simplifies some aspects of record-keeping, employers still need to ensure they have a timekeeping system in place that accurately tracks the hours worked by tipped employees. It is essential to ensure that the wages (base pay plus tips) equal at least the federal minimum wage.


  • No Need for Immediate Adjustments: If you were already applying the pre-2021 tip credit rule, no changes are necessary on your part. For those who had adjusted to the "80/20/30" rule, reverting back to the previous method should not require significant changes.


  • State and Local Laws: Employers should still be mindful of any state or local laws that may have stricter requirements than federal law. Always check your state’s labor regulations to ensure full compliance.


Why Is This Change Important?

The reinstatement of the simplified tip credit rule provides relief to many employers, particularly in industries like restaurants, hotels, and other service-based businesses where tipping is common. The pre-2021 rule is seen as more employer-friendly, offering more flexibility in how tipped employees can spend their time without losing eligibility for the tip credit.


For employers, this means less administrative burden, reduced risk of compliance issues, and potentially fewer legal challenges. This shift is a step toward simplifying labor law compliance for businesses already struggling with the complexities of wage and hour rules.


Looking Ahead

As we move further into 2025, it’s important for employers to stay informed of any future changes in federal labor regulations. While this change restores a previous rule, the DOL’s stance on tip credits and wage issues can continue to evolve. Employers in tip-dependent industries should continue to monitor updates from the Department of Labor and legal rulings to ensure ongoing compliance.


The DOL’s restoration of the pre-2021 tip credit rule is a welcome change for many businesses, offering a return to simpler guidelines and less restrictive requirements. For most employers, no immediate action is required, but it’s always a good idea to review your practices to ensure they align with the updated rule.


If you need further assistance in navigating these changes, reach out to Simco to ensure your business stays compliant in 2025 and beyond.

Sign up for our newsletter.

February 3, 2025
Overview of the New Ruling New York employers are once again required to provide a notice in their employee handbooks about reproductive health rights following a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The ruling vacated a previous permanent injunction that had blocked the enforcement of the law, meaning employers must now comply with the New York Reproductive Health Bias Law (Labor Law § 203-e). Reproductive Health Bias Law Requirements The Reproductive Health Bias Law was enacted in November 2019 to ensure employees and their dependents can make reproductive health decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace. The law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees regarding their reproductive health decisions and requires employers to keep employees' reproductive health information confidential unless there is prior written consent. Under the law, employers must include a notice in their employee handbooks informing employees of their rights and remedies under the Act. This is an essential update that must be made to comply with the law. Impact of the Second Circuit Ruling Religious organizations had challenged the law, arguing that the notice requirement violated their First Amendment rights. However, the Second Circuit disagreed, ruling that the notice requirement was lawful and similar to other workplace disclosure laws. The court noted that while the policy motivating the law may be controversial, the law itself and the obligation for employers to comply are not in question. Action Required for Employers Even though there is no specific penalty for failing to comply with the notice requirement, employers are encouraged to review and update their employee handbooks in light of the court's ruling to ensure they are compliant with the law. For Simco Clients: For clients who utilize Simco’s employee handbook services, rest assured this requirement is already included, and no additional steps are needed.
February 1, 2025
Pre-employment drug testing is a hiring practice that has sparked debate in recent years. While some industries rely on it for safety and compliance, others are rethinking its necessity—especially as marijuana laws evolve. If you're actively job searching, knowing what to expect can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and understand your rights. Who Still Requires Drug Testing? Not all industries conduct pre-employment drug testing, but for certain roles, it's still a non-negotiable requirement. Some of the most common sectors where testing remains standard include: Transportation & Public Safety – Truck drivers, pilots, transit operators, and law enforcement Healthcare & Childcare – Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and daycare providers Government & Military Contracts – Federal employees, military personnel, and defense contractors Manufacturing & Construction – Heavy equipment operators and industrial workers handling hazardous materials However, policies vary widely even within these industries. Some companies are now loosening restrictions for non-safety-sensitive positions, recognizing that outdated drug testing policies may limit their talent pool. What Substances Are Typically Screened? Most pre-employment drug tests screen for common illicit substances, but the depth of testing can vary. Standard screenings include: Five-Panel Test – Detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and PCP Expanded Panel Tests – Can include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, synthetic opioids, and even alcohol Employers may use different types of tests, including urine, saliva, blood, or hair follicle analysis. Hair follicle testing, for example, can detect drug use from months prior—something applicants should be mindful of. The Evolving Landscape of Marijuana Testing One of the most significant changes in pre-employment drug testing involves marijuana. With over half of U.S. states legalizing marijuana in some form, companies are reevaluating their stance. Some states prohibit employers from disqualifying candidates for off-duty marijuana use. Other states still allow testing but require employers to prove impairment, not just presence. Federally regulated positions, such as those in transportation, maintain strict no-tolerance policies. This shift means that while some applicants may no longer face automatic disqualification for marijuana use, it’s still important to know an employer’s policy before assuming it won’t impact hiring decisions. What Happens If You Fail a Pre-Employment Drug Test? The consequences of failing a drug test depend on multiple factors, including company policy, industry regulations, and state laws. In regulated industries (e.g., transportation, healthcare, federal employment), a failed test almost always results in immediate disqualification. Some employers allow re-testing or a waiting period before reapplying, particularly for marijuana use in certain states. If you have a valid prescription for a tested substance (e.g., opioids or ADHD medication), you may need to provide documentation to avoid disqualification. Additionally, some companies offer assistance programs or second-chance policies, especially if an applicant is upfront about past use or addiction recovery. Do Employers Really Benefit from Drug Testing? With the workforce evolving, many companies are questioning whether traditional drug testing policies still serve their intended purpose. Some argue that testing reduces liability, improves workplace safety, and ensures reliable employees. However, others believe that outdated policies exclude qualified candidates, especially in a competitive job market. The Arguments for Drug Testing: Reduces workplace accidents in safety-sensitive roles Ensures compliance with federal and industry regulations Discourages drug use in high-responsibility positions The Arguments Against Drug Testing: May eliminate qualified candidates for non-safety-sensitive roles Does not account for impairment vs. past use (especially with marijuana) Can be costly and time-consuming for employers Companies that still require drug testing must weigh these factors and ensure their policies align with modern workforce expectations. The Future of Pre-Employment Drug Testing The debate over drug testing isn’t going away anytime soon. As laws and attitudes continue shifting, companies may move toward impairment-based testing rather than zero-tolerance screening. This means job seekers should stay informed, especially in industries where testing is likely to remain a requirement. For now, the best approach is to understand employer expectations, know your legal protections, and be prepared for potential screenings as part of the hiring process.
January 30, 2025
Workplace Posting for Form 300A Begins February 1 Employers with 11 or more employees at any point in 2024 must display the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, from February 1 to April 30. Even if no recordable incidents occurred in 2024, this posting is mandatory. The form must be certified by a company executive and displayed prominently in each workplace where employee notices are typically posted. Certain businesses are exempt from OSHA’s regular recordkeeping requirements, including this posting, if they employ 10 or fewer people or if their primary business activity is considered low hazard according to OSHA's guidelines. A full list of low-hazard industries, categorized by NAICS codes, is available here . However, even exempt companies must report fatalities or incidents resulting in hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. Electronic Submission of Form 300A Due by March 2 Businesses with 250 or more employees from the previous year, or those with 20-249 employees in high-risk industries, must submit their Form 300A data electronically through OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA) by March 2, 2025. This requirement applies based on the number of employees at a specific location, not the entire company. Employers under State Plans are also required to submit electronically. Exemptions from this electronic submission apply to employers who: Are exempt from OSHA's regular recordkeeping rules. Had fewer than 20 employees in the past year. Had between 20 and 249 employees but aren’t in the designated high-risk industries. Additional resources, FAQs, and access to the ITA are available on OSHA’s ITA page . Submission of Forms 300 and 301 Required by March 2 Employers in high-hazard industries with 100 or more employees are required to submit data from both their Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) through the ITA, in addition to their Form 300A submission. Help with Coverage Determination Employers can use OSHA’s ITA Coverage Application to assess whether they need to submit injury and illness data electronically or refer to the State Plan for specific reporting requirements.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: