Follow Us
Join our newsletter
Get the latest news delivered to your inbox.
Enhancing Employee Learning and Development With Learning Management Systems
October 26, 2023
A recent survey by management consulting company Gallup found that nearly three-quarters of the U.S. workforce are not engaged. Learning and development (L&D) opportunities provide employees with a purpose, encourage community and foster curiosity, all of which can contribute to increased employee engagement. Furthermore, these programs show employees their development is valued, which can boost morale and improve attraction and retention. In fact, educational technology company LinkedIn Learning found that three of the top five reasons employees search for new jobs relate to their desire to learn, grow and develop new skills.
Successful L&D programs can also help employers reduce skills gaps and drive operational excellence. Yet, traditional learning opportunities aren’t always compatible with a modern workforce. For example, employers with a multi-generational workforce, a significant number of remote or semi-remote employees, or employees with a wide range of learning styles may find that conventional learning practices create unequal growth and learning opportunities within an organization. Therefore, finding an effective means for online training, such as a learning management system (LMS), is a critical aspect of many L&D programs.
This article explains how LMSs can be used to further L&D programs and outlines potential benefits and drawbacks.
LMS Overview
An LMS is a software application or web-based technology employers can use to plan, design, implement and evaluate their L&D programs. They’re often used to store e-learning content and automate employee learning processes. LMSs can have basic functionality or be highly advanced technology that can gamify learning, advance social and mobile learning, and use artificial intelligence. The following are common functions of LMSs:
- Oversee training and e-learning
- Store, organize and distribute courses
- Track individual progress
- Set employee goals
- Communicate with individuals
- Provide detailed analyses
- Identify skills gaps
- Indicate individuals in need of additional support
Benefits of Using LMSs
LMSs can benefit organizations that want to provide self-paced learning opportunities or have a widely dispersed workforce. They can help organizations evolve, accelerate growth and address talent shortages.
Using an LMS for L&D programs may be advantageous, as it may achieve the following:
- Reduce cost. Over the long term, e-learning can be a cost-effective learning solution. With LMSs, employers don’t need to pay for travel, instructors, vendors or other materials (e.g., training manuals), which can reduce total training costs.
- Save time. These systems allow employers to build complete courses quickly. These courses can continually reused and revised, reducing the time needed to onboard or retrain employees. Furthermore, LMSs lessen the administrative burden by automating much of the learning process. They also allow employees the opportunity for self-paced learning, which can reduce the amount of time employees spend away from work training.
- Promote a learning culture. Giving employees a tool for continual and self-driven learning with LMSs can enable employers to create a culture of growth and learning. This can benefit both employers and employees by providing individuals with access to updated training and upskilling programs that can reduce skills gaps within an organization. LMSs also allow organizations to understand how effective their training programs are by measuring learning outcomes and connecting them to organizational performance.
- Ensure compliance. Many organizations are required to provide employees with certain mandatory training (e.g., anti-harassment or health and safety training). LMSs track and store information proving that employees took and understood the required training. This can benefit employers in case of an audit or accident.
- Boost engagement. Employers can create innovative and meaningful content to boost employee interest and engagement in L&D. Many LMSs allow for gamification, in which employees can unlock higher skill levels by gaining certain features, such as trophies and badges. This can motivate employees to reach new levels of learning and achievement, increasing engagement and improving the user experience.
- Provide flexible learning. LMSs can easily be scaled up or down to meet the needs of an organization. Employers may choose from a wide variety of learning formats, including videos, webinars and e-learning modules. Personalized learning paths can also be created to meet individual needs, providing employees with an effective learning experience suited for them.
- Increase accessibility. Using an online learning system can help employers provide all employees with equal access to onboarding and learning opportunities. This can help ensure that employees won’t be held back from professional growth due to location, schedule availability or learning styles.
Drawbacks of LMSs
As a software system, an LMS may not be right for every organization. Before purchasing an LMS, employers should consider the following potential disadvantages:
- Set-up time—There is a significant upfront time commitment to implementing an LMS. After researching different LMS options, employers must learn how to create courses and implement the system, which may require administrators to undergo system training before launching the course. Additionally, coding and IT knowledge may be required to customize the courses.
- User-friendliness—Employees who aren’t tech-savvy may initially struggle to adapt to online learning. As a result, it may take more time for some individuals to adapt to the new technology. Employers can help by selecting LMSs with simple and engaging features to improve employee engagement and use.
- Associated costs—Although LMSs are generally a cost-effective learning solution, there are necessary expenditures, such as purchase fees and implementation, training, security and maintenance costs. These can quickly exceed an employer’s L&D budget. Employers may also find that they must hire additional third-party platforms to boost compatibility and functionality.
- Limited options for personalized learning—The ability to individualize learning to meet employee needs is a crucial benefit of LMSs. However, some LMSs may provide limited opportunities for personalization, which can make employee learning and engagement less effective.
- User issues—If LMS support fails to meet the needs of an organization, it can dramatically impact the functionality of an LMS and cause decreased employee engagement. For example, if an LMS only provides basic tutorial information, administrators and users may struggle with the functionality of courses. Furthermore, e-learning may not be right for all learning styles or all types of training (e.g., physical skills). It also lacks human connection, which some individuals may need or desire for optimal learning.
- Lack of enforceability—Unlike in-person training, which is easy to enforce, LMSs require employees to be self-disciplined and follow through with their training with minimal oversight. As a result, employees may fail to complete essential training. They may also be able to cheat their way through LMS courses, which can undermine the effectiveness of L&D programs.
Conclusion
Employee L&D is a long-term investment that can contribute to organizational success by lowering turnover, reducing skills gaps and improving employee satisfaction. As organizations navigate the diverse needs of a modern workforce, learning technology such as LMSs may help ensure that all employees have equal access to L&D opportunities.
Contact us today for more workplace resources.
Sign up for our newsletter.
Overview of the New Ruling New York employers are once again required to provide a notice in their employee handbooks about reproductive health rights following a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The ruling vacated a previous permanent injunction that had blocked the enforcement of the law, meaning employers must now comply with the New York Reproductive Health Bias Law (Labor Law § 203-e). Reproductive Health Bias Law Requirements The Reproductive Health Bias Law was enacted in November 2019 to ensure employees and their dependents can make reproductive health decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace. The law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees regarding their reproductive health decisions and requires employers to keep employees' reproductive health information confidential unless there is prior written consent. Under the law, employers must include a notice in their employee handbooks informing employees of their rights and remedies under the Act. This is an essential update that must be made to comply with the law. Impact of the Second Circuit Ruling Religious organizations had challenged the law, arguing that the notice requirement violated their First Amendment rights. However, the Second Circuit disagreed, ruling that the notice requirement was lawful and similar to other workplace disclosure laws. The court noted that while the policy motivating the law may be controversial, the law itself and the obligation for employers to comply are not in question. Action Required for Employers Even though there is no specific penalty for failing to comply with the notice requirement, employers are encouraged to review and update their employee handbooks in light of the court's ruling to ensure they are compliant with the law. For Simco Clients: For clients who utilize Simco’s employee handbook services, rest assured this requirement is already included, and no additional steps are needed.
Pre-employment drug testing is a hiring practice that has sparked debate in recent years. While some industries rely on it for safety and compliance, others are rethinking its necessity—especially as marijuana laws evolve. If you're actively job searching, knowing what to expect can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and understand your rights. Who Still Requires Drug Testing? Not all industries conduct pre-employment drug testing, but for certain roles, it's still a non-negotiable requirement. Some of the most common sectors where testing remains standard include: Transportation & Public Safety – Truck drivers, pilots, transit operators, and law enforcement Healthcare & Childcare – Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and daycare providers Government & Military Contracts – Federal employees, military personnel, and defense contractors Manufacturing & Construction – Heavy equipment operators and industrial workers handling hazardous materials However, policies vary widely even within these industries. Some companies are now loosening restrictions for non-safety-sensitive positions, recognizing that outdated drug testing policies may limit their talent pool. What Substances Are Typically Screened? Most pre-employment drug tests screen for common illicit substances, but the depth of testing can vary. Standard screenings include: Five-Panel Test – Detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and PCP Expanded Panel Tests – Can include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, synthetic opioids, and even alcohol Employers may use different types of tests, including urine, saliva, blood, or hair follicle analysis. Hair follicle testing, for example, can detect drug use from months prior—something applicants should be mindful of. The Evolving Landscape of Marijuana Testing One of the most significant changes in pre-employment drug testing involves marijuana. With over half of U.S. states legalizing marijuana in some form, companies are reevaluating their stance. Some states prohibit employers from disqualifying candidates for off-duty marijuana use. Other states still allow testing but require employers to prove impairment, not just presence. Federally regulated positions, such as those in transportation, maintain strict no-tolerance policies. This shift means that while some applicants may no longer face automatic disqualification for marijuana use, it’s still important to know an employer’s policy before assuming it won’t impact hiring decisions. What Happens If You Fail a Pre-Employment Drug Test? The consequences of failing a drug test depend on multiple factors, including company policy, industry regulations, and state laws. In regulated industries (e.g., transportation, healthcare, federal employment), a failed test almost always results in immediate disqualification. Some employers allow re-testing or a waiting period before reapplying, particularly for marijuana use in certain states. If you have a valid prescription for a tested substance (e.g., opioids or ADHD medication), you may need to provide documentation to avoid disqualification. Additionally, some companies offer assistance programs or second-chance policies, especially if an applicant is upfront about past use or addiction recovery. Do Employers Really Benefit from Drug Testing? With the workforce evolving, many companies are questioning whether traditional drug testing policies still serve their intended purpose. Some argue that testing reduces liability, improves workplace safety, and ensures reliable employees. However, others believe that outdated policies exclude qualified candidates, especially in a competitive job market. The Arguments for Drug Testing: Reduces workplace accidents in safety-sensitive roles Ensures compliance with federal and industry regulations Discourages drug use in high-responsibility positions The Arguments Against Drug Testing: May eliminate qualified candidates for non-safety-sensitive roles Does not account for impairment vs. past use (especially with marijuana) Can be costly and time-consuming for employers Companies that still require drug testing must weigh these factors and ensure their policies align with modern workforce expectations. The Future of Pre-Employment Drug Testing The debate over drug testing isn’t going away anytime soon. As laws and attitudes continue shifting, companies may move toward impairment-based testing rather than zero-tolerance screening. This means job seekers should stay informed, especially in industries where testing is likely to remain a requirement. For now, the best approach is to understand employer expectations, know your legal protections, and be prepared for potential screenings as part of the hiring process.
Workplace Posting for Form 300A Begins February 1 Employers with 11 or more employees at any point in 2024 must display the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, from February 1 to April 30. Even if no recordable incidents occurred in 2024, this posting is mandatory. The form must be certified by a company executive and displayed prominently in each workplace where employee notices are typically posted. Certain businesses are exempt from OSHA’s regular recordkeeping requirements, including this posting, if they employ 10 or fewer people or if their primary business activity is considered low hazard according to OSHA's guidelines. A full list of low-hazard industries, categorized by NAICS codes, is available here . However, even exempt companies must report fatalities or incidents resulting in hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. Electronic Submission of Form 300A Due by March 2 Businesses with 250 or more employees from the previous year, or those with 20-249 employees in high-risk industries, must submit their Form 300A data electronically through OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA) by March 2, 2025. This requirement applies based on the number of employees at a specific location, not the entire company. Employers under State Plans are also required to submit electronically. Exemptions from this electronic submission apply to employers who: Are exempt from OSHA's regular recordkeeping rules. Had fewer than 20 employees in the past year. Had between 20 and 249 employees but aren’t in the designated high-risk industries. Additional resources, FAQs, and access to the ITA are available on OSHA’s ITA page . Submission of Forms 300 and 301 Required by March 2 Employers in high-hazard industries with 100 or more employees are required to submit data from both their Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) through the ITA, in addition to their Form 300A submission. Help with Coverage Determination Employers can use OSHA’s ITA Coverage Application to assess whether they need to submit injury and illness data electronically or refer to the State Plan for specific reporting requirements.
Have a question? Get in touch.
Our Services.
From the Blog.
Overview of the New Ruling New York employers are once again required to provide a notice in their employee handbooks about reproductive health rights following a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The ruling vacated a previous permanent injunction that had blocked the enforcement of the law, meaning employers must now comply with the New York Reproductive Health Bias Law (Labor Law § 203-e). Reproductive Health Bias Law Requirements The Reproductive Health Bias Law was enacted in November 2019 to ensure employees and their dependents can make reproductive health decisions without facing discrimination in the workplace. The law prohibits employers from taking retaliatory actions against employees regarding their reproductive health decisions and requires employers to keep employees' reproductive health information confidential unless there is prior written consent. Under the law, employers must include a notice in their employee handbooks informing employees of their rights and remedies under the Act. This is an essential update that must be made to comply with the law. Impact of the Second Circuit Ruling Religious organizations had challenged the law, arguing that the notice requirement violated their First Amendment rights. However, the Second Circuit disagreed, ruling that the notice requirement was lawful and similar to other workplace disclosure laws. The court noted that while the policy motivating the law may be controversial, the law itself and the obligation for employers to comply are not in question. Action Required for Employers Even though there is no specific penalty for failing to comply with the notice requirement, employers are encouraged to review and update their employee handbooks in light of the court's ruling to ensure they are compliant with the law. For Simco Clients: For clients who utilize Simco’s employee handbook services, rest assured this requirement is already included, and no additional steps are needed.
Pre-employment drug testing is a hiring practice that has sparked debate in recent years. While some industries rely on it for safety and compliance, others are rethinking its necessity—especially as marijuana laws evolve. If you're actively job searching, knowing what to expect can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and understand your rights. Who Still Requires Drug Testing? Not all industries conduct pre-employment drug testing, but for certain roles, it's still a non-negotiable requirement. Some of the most common sectors where testing remains standard include: Transportation & Public Safety – Truck drivers, pilots, transit operators, and law enforcement Healthcare & Childcare – Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and daycare providers Government & Military Contracts – Federal employees, military personnel, and defense contractors Manufacturing & Construction – Heavy equipment operators and industrial workers handling hazardous materials However, policies vary widely even within these industries. Some companies are now loosening restrictions for non-safety-sensitive positions, recognizing that outdated drug testing policies may limit their talent pool. What Substances Are Typically Screened? Most pre-employment drug tests screen for common illicit substances, but the depth of testing can vary. Standard screenings include: Five-Panel Test – Detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and PCP Expanded Panel Tests – Can include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, synthetic opioids, and even alcohol Employers may use different types of tests, including urine, saliva, blood, or hair follicle analysis. Hair follicle testing, for example, can detect drug use from months prior—something applicants should be mindful of. The Evolving Landscape of Marijuana Testing One of the most significant changes in pre-employment drug testing involves marijuana. With over half of U.S. states legalizing marijuana in some form, companies are reevaluating their stance. Some states prohibit employers from disqualifying candidates for off-duty marijuana use. Other states still allow testing but require employers to prove impairment, not just presence. Federally regulated positions, such as those in transportation, maintain strict no-tolerance policies. This shift means that while some applicants may no longer face automatic disqualification for marijuana use, it’s still important to know an employer’s policy before assuming it won’t impact hiring decisions. What Happens If You Fail a Pre-Employment Drug Test? The consequences of failing a drug test depend on multiple factors, including company policy, industry regulations, and state laws. In regulated industries (e.g., transportation, healthcare, federal employment), a failed test almost always results in immediate disqualification. Some employers allow re-testing or a waiting period before reapplying, particularly for marijuana use in certain states. If you have a valid prescription for a tested substance (e.g., opioids or ADHD medication), you may need to provide documentation to avoid disqualification. Additionally, some companies offer assistance programs or second-chance policies, especially if an applicant is upfront about past use or addiction recovery. Do Employers Really Benefit from Drug Testing? With the workforce evolving, many companies are questioning whether traditional drug testing policies still serve their intended purpose. Some argue that testing reduces liability, improves workplace safety, and ensures reliable employees. However, others believe that outdated policies exclude qualified candidates, especially in a competitive job market. The Arguments for Drug Testing: Reduces workplace accidents in safety-sensitive roles Ensures compliance with federal and industry regulations Discourages drug use in high-responsibility positions The Arguments Against Drug Testing: May eliminate qualified candidates for non-safety-sensitive roles Does not account for impairment vs. past use (especially with marijuana) Can be costly and time-consuming for employers Companies that still require drug testing must weigh these factors and ensure their policies align with modern workforce expectations. The Future of Pre-Employment Drug Testing The debate over drug testing isn’t going away anytime soon. As laws and attitudes continue shifting, companies may move toward impairment-based testing rather than zero-tolerance screening. This means job seekers should stay informed, especially in industries where testing is likely to remain a requirement. For now, the best approach is to understand employer expectations, know your legal protections, and be prepared for potential screenings as part of the hiring process.
Our Company.
Sign up for our Newsletter.
Designed and Developed by Vessel Digital Marketing