Answers to Frequently Asked Questions on the DOL Proposed Overtime Rule
September 23, 2023
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions on the DOL Proposed Overtime Rule

On Aug. 30, 2023, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a proposed rule to amend current requirements employees in white collar occupations must satisfy to qualify for an overtime exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).


The FLSA white collar exemptions apply to individuals in executive, administrative, professional, and some outside sales and computer-related occupations. Some highly compensated employees may also qualify for the FLSA white collar overtime exemption.


To qualify for this exemption, white collar employees must satisfy the standard salary level test, among other criteria. This salary level is a wage threshold that white collar employees must receive to qualify for the exemption.


The DOL is proposing to increase the standard salary level from:

  • $684 to $1,059 per week ($55,068 per year); and
  • $107,432 to $143,988 per year for highly compensated employees.


Action Steps

The proposal does not impose any new requirements on employers at this time. However, employers should become familiar with the proposed rule and evaluate what changes they may need to adopt if the rule is implemented as proposed.


OVERVIEW

1. What is the purpose of the Department’s proposed rule?

This rulemaking proposes to update and revise the regulations for determining whether certain white-collar salaried employees are exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements under section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Employees are exempt if they are employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional (EAP) capacity as those terms are defined in the Department of Labor’s regulations at 29 CFR part 541. This exemption from the FLSA is sometimes referred to as the “white-collar” or “EAP” exemption.


2. What is “overtime?”

Unless specifically exempted, an employee covered by the FLSA must receive pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than one and one-half their regular rate of pay. This is referred to as “overtime” pay.


3. What determines if an employee falls within the EAP exemption? 

Currently, to fall within the EAP exemption, an employee generally must: 


  1. Be paid a salary, meaning that they are paid a predetermined and fixed amount that is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of work performed (the “salary basis test”);
  2. Be paid at least a specified weekly salary level, which is $684 per week (the equivalent of $35,568 annually for a full-year employee) in the current regulations (the “salary level test”); and
  3. Primarily perform executive, administrative, or professional duties, as provided in the department’s regulations (the “duties test”). 


Certain employees are not subject to either the salary basis or salary level tests (for example, doctors, teachers, and lawyers).


4. When did the Department last revise the exemption regulations for EAP workers?

The Department last updated the EAP exemption regulations in 2019. That update, which included setting the standard salary level test at its current amount of $684 per week (equivalent to a $35,568 annual salary), has been in effect since January 1, 2020.


5. Why is the Department proposing to revise the exemption regulations for EAP workers?

The Department is committed to keeping the earnings thresholds up to date for the benefit of both workers and employers. Four years have passed since the 2019 rule, during which time salaried workers in the U.S. economy have experienced a rapid growth in their nominal wages, which lessens the effectiveness of the current salary level threshold. Through this rulemaking, the Department seeks to update the salary level test to more effectively identify who is employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity and ensure that the FLSA’s intended overtime protections are fully implemented.


In addition to updating the salary level to account for increased wages, the Department’s proposal would ensure that the salary level effectively performs its historic function of screening nonexempt employees from the overtime exemption and would more effectively account for the switch from a two-test to a one-test system.


6. What is the Department proposing to change about its exemption regulations for EAP workers?

In this rulemaking, the Department proposes to:


  • Increase the standard salary level to the 35th percentile of earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (currently the South), which would be $1,059 per week ($55,068 annually) based on current data;
  • Apply the standard salary level to Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and increase the special salary levels for American Samoa and the motion picture industry; 
  • Increase the highly compensated employee (HCE) total annual compensation requirement to the annualized weekly earnings of the 85th percentile of full-time salaried workers nationally, which would be $143,988 per year based on current data; and
  • Automatically update these earnings thresholds every 3 years with current wage data to maintain their effectiveness.


7. Is the Department proposing any changes to the current duties test?

The Department is not proposing changes to the standard duties test, consistent with its approach in both the 2016 and 2019 rules. At this time, the Department favors keeping the current standard duties test, which is well known to employers and employees. As long as it is paired with an appropriate salary level requirement, the standard duties test can appropriately distinguish bona fide EAP employees from nonexempt workers. 


8. Where can I review, and how can I comment on, the Department’s proposed changes to the exemption regulations for EAP workers?

The Department's Notice for Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) is available at www.regulations.gov. The Department encourages all interested parties to participate in the rulemaking process by submitting written comments regarding the NPRM within 60 days from the publication date in the Federal Register. 


FLSA Basics

9. What does the FLSA do?

The FLSA establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards for employees in the private sector and in federal, state, and local governments. Covered nonexempt workers are entitled to a federal minimum wage of not less than $7.25 per hour. Overtime pay at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay is required after 40 hours of work in a workweek.


10. Who is covered by the FLSA?

Generally, employees of enterprises that have an annual gross volume of sales made or business done of $500,000 or more are covered by the FLSA. In addition, employees of certain businesses are covered by the FLSA regardless of the amount of gross volume of sales or business done. These businesses include hospitals; establishments providing medical or nursing care for residents; schools (whether operated for profit or not for profit); and public agencies. Employees of employers that are not covered by the FLSA on an enterprise basis may still be entitled to its protections if they are individually engaged in interstate commerce.


11. Does the FLSA and the Department’s proposed rule apply to state or local government workers?

Yes, state and local government employers are subject to the FLSA and the Department’s proposed regulations concerning EAP employees.


12. Is there a small business exemption from the FLSA or the Department’s proposed rule for EAP workers?

The FLSA does not provide an exemption for small businesses. Generally, the FLSA and the proposed rule apply to employees of enterprises that have an annual gross volume of sales made or business done of $500,000 or more, and certain other businesses. The FLSA creates a level playing field for businesses by setting a floor below which employers may not pay their employees.


13. Is there an exemption for nonprofit organizations from the FLSA or the Department’s proposed rule?

There is no exemption for nonprofit organizations under the FLSA or in the proposed rule. Thus, the proposed rule may impact nonprofit organizations that have an annual dollar volume of sales or business done of at least $500,000. In determining coverage, only activities performed for a business purpose are considered. Charitable, religious, educational, or similar activities of organizations operated on a nonprofit basis where such activities are not in substantial competition with other businesses are not considered. Employees of employers that are not covered by the FLSA on an enterprise basis may still be entitled to its protections if they are individually engaged in interstate commerce.


14. How is overtime pay determined?

Unless exempt, an employee covered by the FLSA must receive overtime pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than one and one-half times their regular rate of pay. For guidance in determining an employee’s “regular rate of pay” when calculating overtime pay, refer to WHD Fact Sheet #56A or the Department’s regulations at 29 CFR part 778.


15. What is the FLSA’s EAP exemption?

Section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA exempts individuals employed in a “bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity” from the Act’s minimum wage and overtime requirements. Certain computer professionals and outside sales employees are included in the exemption and therefore excluded from the minimum wage and overtime requirements. The FLSA instructs the Department to issue regulations that define and delimit the EAP exemption; those regulations are located at 29 CFR part 541.


16. I'm paid a salary and my job title is manager. Am I exempt from overtime pay?

Job titles do not determine exempt status, and the fact that a white-collar employee is paid on a salary basis is not alone sufficient to exempt that employee from the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime requirements. For an exemption to apply, an employee’s specific job duties and salary must meet all of the applicable requirements provided in the Department’s regulations.


17. What if a state has its own laws about who is entitled to overtime pay?

The FLSA provides minimum standards and does not preempt a state from establishing more protective standards. If a state establishes a more protective standard than the provisions of the FLSA, the higher standard applies in that state. This would include, for example, exemption criteria for EAP employees under state law with higher earnings thresholds than those provided in the Department’s federal regulations.


Earnings Thresholds

18. What are the current earnings thresholds needed for the EAP exemption?

Under the current regulations, an executive, administrative, or professional employee generally must be paid at least $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 annually for a full-year employee) to be exempt from the FLSA overtime protections. This $684 per week threshold is the standard salary level. 


A computer professional may be exempt if they are paid at least $684 per week or at least $27.63 an hour, if paid on an hourly basis. 


There is no salary level test required to qualify as an exempt outside sales employee. Certain professionals including doctors, lawyers, and teachers are also not subject to the salary tests. 


Finally, the current regulations also contain a less restrictive duties test for certain highly compensated employees who receive total annual compensation of $107,432 or more and are paid at least $684 per week.


19. What is the proposed standard salary level?

The Department is proposing to set the standard salary level at the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (the South). Using 2022 data, the proposed salary amount would equal $1,059 per week (which is $55,068 annually for a full-year worker). 


20. Why is the Department proposing to set the standard salary level at the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers?

In updating the standard salary level, the Department seeks to more effectively identify who is employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity. The proposal updates the standard salary level to account for earnings growth since the 2019 rule and adjusts the salary level methodology based on the lessons learned in recent rulemakings. 


21. What salary levels have the Department proposed to apply in U.S. territories?

This proposal would restore the Department’s longstanding policy prior to 2019 of only setting special lower salary levels for employees in those U.S. territories that are not subject to the full federal minimum wage (currently $7.25 per hour). Accordingly, the Department proposes to apply the standard salary level ($1,059 per week) to employees in Puerto Rico, where the federal minimum wage has applied since 1996; Guam, where the federal minimum wage has applied since at least 1957; the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the federal minimum wage has applied since 1989; and the CNMI, where the federal minimum wage has applied since 2018.


The Department proposes to set a special salary level for employees in American Samoa equal to 84 percent of the standard salary level ($890 per week, based on a proposed standard salary level of $1,059 per month), since American Samoa remains subject to special minimum wage rates below the federal minimum wage. American Samoa is scheduled to increase its minimum wage rates until they equal the federal minimum wage. The Department proposes that 90 days after the highest industry minimum wage for American Samoa equals the federal minimum wage, the full standard salary level would apply for all EAP employees in all industries in American Samoa.


22. Is the Department proposing to change the special base rate for employees in the motion picture industry?

The current regulations permit employers to exempt employees in the motion picture industry who are paid a specified base rate per week (or a proportionate amount based on the number of days worked), so long as they meet the duties test for the EAP exemption. Consistent with its practice in recent rulemakings, the Department proposes to increase the required base rate in proportion to the proposed increase in the standard salary level test, resulting in a proposed base rate of $1,617 per week (or a proportionate amount based on the number of days worked). 


23. Is the Department proposing to increase the salary level for highly compensated employees?

The Department is proposing to set the Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) annual compensation level equal to the 85th percentile of earnings for full-time salaried workers nationwide. Based on current data, the proposed HCE threshold would be $143,988 per year, of which at least $1,059 per week (the proposed standard salary level) would have to be paid on a salary or fee basis. The Department believes that its proposed methodology results in an HCE level that is low enough to not restrict the use of the HCE test for employers in low-wage regions and industries, and high enough to guard against the unintended exemption of workers who are not bona fide executive, administrative, or professional employees in higher-income regions and industries.


Future Updates

24. Does the proposed rule address future updates to the earnings thresholds provided in the EAP exemption regulations?

The Department is proposing a mechanism to automatically update the earnings thresholds every three years to ensure that they remain effective tests for exemption. If finalized, this proposal would ensure that the Department can timely and efficiently update the earnings thresholds in future years to reflect current wage data. Experience has shown that the salary level test is a strong measure of exempt status only when it is up to date. Left unchanged, the test becomes substantially less effective as wages for overtime-protected workers increase over time. Automatically updating the salary level and HCE total annual compensation requirement using the most recent data will ensure that these tests continue to accurately reflect current economic conditions.


25. How is the Department proposing to automatically update the salary level and HCE total compensation levels?

The Department is proposing to update the standard salary level and the HCE total compensation requirement every three years to reflect current earnings data. Specifically, the Department is proposing to update the standard salary level by adjusting it to remain at the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time nonhourly workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (currently the South). The Department is proposing to update the HCE total annual compensation requirement to remain at the annualized weekly earnings of the 85th percentile of full-time nonhourly workers nationally. The Department proposes to update both of these thresholds using the most recent available four quarters of data, as published by BLS, preceding the publication of the Department’s notice to automatically update the thresholds.


Because the proposed special salary level for American Samoa and the base rate for the motion picture industry are set in relation to the standard salary level, those earnings thresholds would also reset at the time the standard salary level is updated. At least 150 days before the date of the update of the standard salary level and the HCE total annual compensation requirement, the Department would publish in the Federal Register a notice with the new earnings levels described above.


26. Does the proposed rule include any special exceptions where the earnings thresholds would not be automatically updated?

The Department’s proposal includes a provision allowing the Department to temporarily delay a scheduled automatic update where unforeseen economic or other conditions warrant. This feature would afford the Department added flexibility to adopt to unforeseen circumstances without sacrificing the benefits provided by automatic updating.


Impact

27. What are the estimated costs, benefits, and transfers of the proposed rule?

The Department estimates that in Year 1, the proposed rule would impose $1.2 billion of direct costs on employers, including $427.2 million in regulatory familiarization costs, $240.8 million in adjustment costs, and $534.9 million in managerial costs. The Department estimates that the proposed rule would result in a Year 1 income transfer of $1.2 billion from employers to employees, predominantly from new overtime premiums, or pay raises to maintain the exempt status of some affected employees. Beyond these wage transfers, the proposal could reduce the risk of misclassification, increase worker productivity, reduce employee turnover, and increase personal time for workers. 


28. How many employees would be impacted by the proposed salary level increase?

In the first year, the Department estimates that 3.4 million workers exempt under the current regulations who earn at least the current weekly salary level of $684 but less than the proposed salary level of $1,059 would, without some intervening action by their employers, become newly entitled to overtime protection under the FLSA. 


Similarly, the Department estimates that an additional 248,900 workers who earn at least $107,432 per year (the current HCE total annual compensation level) and who meet the minimal HCE duties test but not the standard duties test, would, without some intervening action by employers, become eligible for overtime if the HCE total annual compensation level were increased to the proposed level of $143,988 per year. 



Source: U.S. Department of Labor – Frequently Asked Questions for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees

Sign up for our newsletter.

Your Guide to 4th of July Fun, Fireworks, and Celebrating Safely in Ontario County

June 30, 2025
The Fourth of July is almost here, and communities across Ontario County are gearing up for a weekend filled with parades, fireworks, and hometown celebrations. Whether you're heading out for live music and lawn games or simply enjoying time with friends and family, there are plenty of ways to celebrate locally. At Simco, we’re proud to support our neighbors with practical tips to enjoy the holiday safely, while making sure your insurance coverage is up to date and ready for the unexpected. Where to Watch Fireworks in Ontario County JULY 3 Farmington – Fireworks at dusk with food trucks and live music starting at 6 PM (Farmington Town Park) Honeoye Lake – The beloved “Ring of Fire” lights up the lake, with parking available at Sandy Bottom Park JULY 4 Canandaigua – Lincoln Hill Farms hosts an all-day celebration (1–10 PM) with fireworks after dark, music, games, and more. ($30 parking, cash only) JULY 5 Canandaigua North Shore – Keep the celebrations going with another round of fireworks at dark JULY 11 Geneva – Free Summerfest fireworks at 9:45 PM at the Geneva Recreation Center Parade Lineup JULY 3 Honeoye – Parade at 7 PM from United Church to Sandy Bottom Park. Stick around for the Honeoye Community Band and the Ring of Fire afterward! JULY 4 Canandaigua – The city’s annual 4th of July Parade kicks off at 10 AM from City Hall and heads south along Main Street JULY 12 Geneva – Firefighters Parade begins at 7 PM on Exchange Street, ending at the Geneva Rec Center for SummerFest festivities What Fireworks Are Legal in New York? While fireworks are a staple of July 4th, not everything that sparks and explodes is legal in New York State. Using illegal fireworks can actually void your insurance coverage if something goes wrong. What’s Allowed in NY: Ground-based or handheld sparkling devices (like cylindrical fountains or cones) Wooden sparklers/dipped sticks Party poppers Snappers (the small “pop” ones) What’s Not Allowed (and Not Covered): Aerial consumer fireworks Firecrackers Chasers Roman candles Skyrockets Bombs (even small ones!) Metal wire sparklers (they burn much hotter than they look) Quick Tip: If it launches into the sky or explodes, it’s not legal. Stick to sparklers and save yourself a potential insurance headache. Insurance Tips for a Safe Holiday A little awareness goes a long way in protecting your home, family, and peace of mind this 4th of July. Stay within NY guidelines. If an incident is caused by illegal fireworks, your insurer may deny the claim. Keep safety front and center. Supervise all activities involving sparklers or devices and keep water nearby for emergencies. Know what your policy covers. Not every homeowner’s policy includes damage from fireworks-related accidents. If you’re unsure, reach out. We’re happy to review your coverage. Report incidents quickly. Prompt reporting helps ensure claims are handled smoothly and effectively. From All of Us at Simco We’re wishing you a joyful, memorable, and safe Independence Day. Whether you’re lighting up the sky with sparklers or relaxing lakeside with family, we’re here to help you protect what matters most, before, during, and after the festivities. Have questions about your insurance coverage this summer? 📞 Call us at 585-394-5482 or visit our Contact Us page.

Understanding Accent Discrimination in the Workplace: How Employers Can Lead with Inclusion

June 25, 2025
As organizations continue to grow and diversify, the way we communicate at work is evolving, bringing new opportunities for inclusion as well as potential blind spots. One issue that often goes overlooked is accent discrimination: the tendency to judge, exclude, or undervalue individuals based on their speech patterns, dialect, or pronunciation. While accents are often rooted in geography, heritage, or culture, bias toward or against certain ways of speaking can influence decisions in hiring, promotions, evaluations, and daily interactions. For employers, particularly those in small to mid-sized organizations, understanding where this shows up and how to respond isn’t just about creating a respectful workplace. It’s also essential for risk mitigation and legal compliance. What Constitutes Accent Discrimination? Accent discrimination occurs when employees or candidates are treated unfairly due to the way they speak. This type of treatment may stem from overt, conscious bias, such as assuming someone is less capable based on how they sound, or from more subtle, unconscious preferences, like favoring those who speak in what’s perceived as a “standard” or “neutral” accent. Legally, accent-based discrimination can be considered a form of national origin discrimination, which is prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Many states reinforce these protections through their own civil rights laws. Employers should be aware that even unintentional practices, such as informal communication preferences or subjective feedback, can result in compliance issues or reputational damage. Clear Communication vs. Discriminatory Practice It is important to distinguish between legitimate communication needs and bias. In certain narrowly defined circumstances, an accent may be relevant to an employee’s ability to perform essential duties. For instance, in roles that require precise, real-time verbal communication, such as emergency response or high-risk operational jobs, an employer may need to assess whether a language barrier or speech pattern materially interferes with safety or accuracy. However, such evaluations must be backed by objective evidence and a clearly defined business necessity. Vague discomfort, personal preference, or client feedback based on unfamiliarity are not valid reasons to deny someone an opportunity. Any decision related to an accent must be both job-related and supported by measurable performance impacts. Standardize Hiring and Promotion Processes to Minimize Bias One of the most effective ways to reduce the risk of discrimination is by formalizing your hiring and promotion practices. Employers should examine whether their processes allow room for bias (conscious or unconscious) to influence decisions. Subjective impressions, especially in interviews or internal evaluations, can be disproportionately shaped by how a person speaks. To counteract this, companies should move toward structured, competency-based hiring frameworks. Use consistent criteria and scoring systems across all candidates, and rely on written assessments or role-specific tasks where appropriate. Similarly, promotions should be guided by documented performance metrics, not informal perceptions of professionalism or communication style. In doing so, not only do you reduce the chance for bias to affect outcomes, but you also make better staffing decisions that reflect skills, qualifications, and organizational fit: not speech patterns. Why This Matters More Now In today’s hybrid and remote work environments, the ability to navigate diverse communication styles has become even more important. With teams collaborating across geographic regions and cultural backgrounds, inclusivity in communication is essential for morale, cohesion, and productivity. Moreover, younger workers and job seekers are placing a high value on belonging and inclusion. Discriminatory or exclusionary behavior, intentional or not, can quickly erode trust and lead to disengagement or turnover, especially when tied to identity-based characteristics like accent or dialect. Employers who lead with fairness in communication are more likely to attract and retain talent, maintain strong teams, and avoid costly compliance missteps. Building a Culture Where All Voices Are Valued Ultimately, embracing different accents in the workplace is about genuine, judgment-free listening. Employers should encourage active listening practices, create space for respectful clarification when needed, and ensure employees feel safe speaking up, regardless of how they sound. Miscommunication is a solvable issue. Discrimination is not. Leaders who prioritize clarity, fairness, and consistency, rather than conformity, build workplaces that are both inclusive and high-performing. And the benefits go beyond compliance. They create environments where people thrive because they are heard and valued.

Balancing Holiday Time Off Requests Without Slowing Down Your Business

June 18, 2025
Between Independence Day, summer travel plans, and Labor Day on the horizon, time-off requests are about to pick up significantly, and with good reason. Employees need time to recharge, spend time with family, and enjoy the season. For employers, especially in small to mid-sized businesses, this means finding the delicate balance between fostering a supportive work culture that respects employees’ need for time away and managing the practical realities of maintaining adequate coverage, meeting deadlines, and keeping operations running smoothly. The good news? With thoughtful planning, clear communication, and the right tools in place, you can navigate this busy season effectively, ensuring your team gets the rest they deserve without compromising business continuity. Here are a few practical strategies to help you manage PTO during the summer months while keeping your business running smoothly:  1. Plan Early and Communicate Clearly Encourage employees to submit holiday PTO requests well in advance. Set a clear internal deadline (e.g., “All holiday time-off requests must be submitted by August 15”) and explain the process upfront, including: How requests will be reviewed and approved How overlapping requests will be handled Any blackout dates or essential coverage periods A clear and consistent approach eliminates guesswork, reduces friction, and helps everyone feel they’re being treated fairly. 2. Use a PTO Policy That Balances Fairness and Flexibility Your time-off policy should include guidelines for high-demand periods like Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s. Some companies use: First-come, first-served approvals A rotation system so everyone eventually gets prime time off A seniority or department-based system with built-in equity checks Whatever method you choose, consistency is key. A well-documented policy gives managers a framework to follow, and gives employees peace of mind that decisions are made justly, not arbitrarily. 3. Leverage Your HCM or Scheduling Technology If you're using a system like isolved , you already have powerful tools to streamline the PTO process. Automate request tracking, visualize department coverage in real time, and flag conflicts early to avoid blind spots. This gives HR and team leads the visibility they need to make smart, timely decisions. Bonus tip: Use system alerts to notify managers when coverage is thin, or configure it to close PTO windows automatically after a set date. These features take manual work off your plate while protecting productivity. 4. Cross-Train and Create Holiday Coverage Plans Rather than scrambling when someone’s out, prepare your team to adapt. Cross-train employees in advance so they can cover essential tasks if a teammate is unavailable. Before the busy season kicks in, put together a simple holiday coverage plan that outlines: Who will monitor essential tasks (client inquiries, payroll processing, etc.) What needs to get done and by whom each week Who’s available for backup support if needed A little upfront planning makes a big difference in keeping service levels steady during staff absences. 5. Appreciate Those Who Step Up Don’t let holiday contributions go unnoticed. Employees who work through the holidays or shift their schedules to ensure coverage deserve meaningful recognition. Consider: Spot bonuses or incentives Public recognition in a team meeting or internal email Additional time off (comp time) after the holidays Even small gestures show your team that their flexibility and dedication are valued, and that you see the extra effort. 6. Set Expectations With Clients (and With Your Team) If your operations will run on limited hours or staffing during the holidays, notify clients and partners well in advance. Clear communication avoids surprises and sets realistic expectations. Internally, define what’s essential versus what can wait, especially to avoid employees overworking during slower periods. When everyone understands what’s expected, your team can better prioritize, delegate, and breathe a little easier during the season. Final Thought: Flexibility Builds Loyalty The holiday season is a test of your workplace culture. How you support your team, especially when juggling competing needs, leaves a lasting impression. Even when saying no to a request, doing so with empathy and transparency reinforces a culture of trust, fairness, and respect. And in return, you'll see greater engagement, improved morale, and a team that’s ready to go the extra mile — during the holidays and beyond. Need help building better time-off workflows or updating your PTO policies before year-end? Simco’s HR and HCM experts are here to help. Let’s talk about how to balance compliance, efficiency, and employee satisfaction, all year round.

Have a question? Get in touch.